Trust Formation in Collaborative New Product Development
By Ludwig Bstieler. 2006
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51a90a6a16eb0eb3657a88ba8551dfab78b3d2cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Dirk De Clercq
- Dimo Dimov
- Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl
- Satish Nambisan
- Emiel F. M. Wubben
- Robert A. Baron
- Peter Gordon Roetzel
- L. Klerkx
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Dirk De Clercq
- Dimo Dimov
- Emiel F. M. Wubben
- Satish Nambisan
- Robert A. Baron
- Peter Gordon Roetzel
- Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl
- L. Klerkx
In Strategy and Management
- Dimo Dimov
- Dirk De Clercq
- Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl
- S. Omta
- Emiel F. M. Wubben
- Satish Nambisan
- Robert A. Baron
- Peter Gordon Roetzel
Citations in the corpus
- Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development (2018, background): “…trust affects the information weighting behavior of decision-makers (e.g., in risk management (Earle 2010; Slovic 1993) or innovation management (Bstieler 2006; Staples and Webster 2008)), the role of trust in information selection in potential information overload situations is widely…”
- Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector (2010, background): “Network interactions In innovation networks, the way partners interact and communicate is said to be another important factor for success, because interaction between network partners enhances trust (Bstieler 2006; Ring and Van de Ven 1994).”
- When good conflict gets better and bad conflict becomes worse: the role of social capital in the conflict–innovation relationship (2009, background): “Extant research accords strong benefits to the presence of trust in exchange relationships, in that a belief in others’ goodwill frees up resources for productive knowledge exchange (Bstieler 2006; Zaheer et al. 1998) and decreases the likelihood that task conflict turns into relationship conflict (”
- The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship (2010, background): “When cross-functional relationships are governed by trust in each other’s goodwill, the reliance on monitoring mechanisms becomes less relevant (Bstieler, 2006), which frees resources that then can enhance the potential for more extensive communication (Zaheer et al., 1998).”
- Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions (2010, methodology): “…collaborators’ perceptions regarding the sense of partnership are often based on the extent to which information regarding the goals, processes, and outcomes of the project have been shared with them by the dominant partner (Bstieler 2006, Jassawalla and Sashittal 1998, Littler et al. 1995).”
- Trust and Creativity: Understanding the Role of Trust in Creativity-Oriented Joint Developments (2009, unknown): “2.3 The need for trust in joint developments Several scholars (inter alias: Bstieler, 2006; Ross, 2006; Zaheer, McEvily & Perrone, 1998) have pointed out that contracts, despite being necessary, are not sufficient to govern a joint development and the ability to rely on mutual trust is a fundament”
- Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: critical issues and management practices (2015, background): “Only in case stakeholders are prepared and willing to bridge the gap between their differences can they overcome these differences and find a shared objective for instance (Bstieler, 2006; Flipse, 2012).”