Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies

By J. Schade, B. Schlag. 2003

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/506b71557dac34f1ab4d72880c7e6fb777437f30

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Will a driving restriction policy reduce car trips?—The case study of Beijing, China (2014, background): “As a consequence, congestion pricing is not readily accepted by the public (Schade and Schlag, 2003; Schuitema, et al., 2010).”
Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness (2006, background): “For instance, the overall evaluation of a TDMmeasure is influenced by expectations of how the individual would be affected, both positively and negatively, by the TDM measure (Joireman et al., 2001; Schade & Schlag, 2003).”
Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing (2007, background): “Among these, variables like negative outcome expectations, perceived unfairness, negative social norms and perceived infringement on freedom have been identified as important determinants (for a comprehensive overview see Schade and Schlag, 2003a).”
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda (2009, unknown): “…implemented, particularly in the travel domain (e.g., Bamberg & Rölle, 2003, Jakobsson, Fujii, & Gärling, 2000; Loukopoulos, Jakobsson, Gärling, Schneider, & Fujii, 2004; Schade & Schlag, 2003a, 2003b; see Steg & Schuitema, 2007, for a review), but also regarding energy use (Steg et al., 2005).”
Why are Energy Policies Acceptable and Effective? (2006, background): “Studies on transport policies reveal that, in general, people evaluate policies as more acceptable when they believe these policies indeed reduce environmental problems (Schade & Schlag, 2003; E. M. Steg, 1996).”
A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway (2011, result): “Similar results are found by for instance Banister (2003), Harrington et al. (2001), Hsu et al. (2008), Ison (2000), Schade and Schlag (2003), Schuitema and Steg (2008), Steg et al. (2006) and Thalmann (2004).”
Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review (2010, background): “Studies of acceptability have been widespread in the field of road pricing, as it is the political concerns, rather than their economic efficacy that have held back implementation (Odeck and Brathen, 1997; Truelove, 1998; Padam and Wijkmark, 2000; Link and Polak, 2003; Marini and Marcucci, 2003; Sch”
The unexpected "yes!" : Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm (2011, background): “This is in accordance to Schade and Schlag (2003) that based on a survey conducted”
Public attitudes towards policy measures for reducing private car use: evidence from a study in Sweden (2005, background): “There are several examples of such applications of attitude theory that have been successful in increasing the understanding of public acceptance or of acceptability of road pricing (e.g., Bamberg and Rölle, 2003; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Schade and Schlag, 2003).”
Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns (2011, methodology): “Three important exceptions are the papers by Stern et al. (1993), Rienstra et al. (1999) and Schade and Schlag (2003): Stern et al. (1993) provides a widely used theoretical foundation for explaining proenvironmental behaviour.”
Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges A Report by the American Psychological Association's Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change Members (2009, unknown): “…communities, and governments and have been shown to affect acceptance of policy measures and technologies (e.g., Jakobsson, Fujii, & Gärling, 2000; Clark, Kotchen, & Moore, 2003; Schade & Schlag, 2003; Nilsson, von Borgstede, & Biel, 2004; Steg, Dreijering, & Abrahamse, 2005; Matthies, 2008).”
The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies (2008, background): “One important feature for the acceptability of transport pricing is the allocation of the revenues (see also Jones, 1991; Schade & Schlag, 2000b, 2003; Small, 1992).”
Individual Factors Influencing Acceptability for Environmental Policies: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “In general, sociodemographic variables tend to show little explanatory power when personal factors or policy-specific beliefs are accounted for [11,14,17].”
A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners' acceptance of road pricing (2004, background): “Finally, it should be noted that acceptance of road pricing may be influenced by many other factors such as, whether the road pricing scheme has a valuable purpose and is effective in achieving this, whether the political procedure for making decisions about road pricing is fair, and whether there i”