A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners' acceptance of road pricing

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns (2011, background): “Income, age, sex and pro-environmental attitudes are among the significant factors identified by Eriksson et al. (2006), Fujii et al. (2004), Jakobsson et al. (2000) and Loukopoulos et al. (2005).”
The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation (2012, background): “, 2010, 2011), and perceptions of unfairness and coerciveness can create resistance to efficiency-enhancing taxes and regulations (Baron and Jurney, 1993; Dresner et al., 2006; Eriksson et al., 2006; Fujii et al., 2004; Kallbekken and Sælen, 2011).”
Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review (2010, background): “In a survey of Sweden, Japan and Taiwan about perceptions of pricing, perceived fairness was higher in Japan and Taiwan than Japan, and acceptance depends on perceived fairness, which was the most important factor (Fujii et al., 2004). Different cultures respond differently to the social dilemma tha”