The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Individual Factors Influencing Acceptability for Environmental Policies: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “When people expect higher personal benefits from a policy, like decreased financial burden or when revenues are allocated to improving individual outcomes, it is positively related to acceptability [11,18,31,53,60,68,70,74].”
A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway (2011, background): “Schuitema and Steg (2008) find support for the idea that “acceptability of transport pricing increases when car users expect to benefit from the allocation of revenues, which is especially the case when revenues are allocated to decrease fixed car-taxes (viz.”
Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns (2011, result): “The result that earmarking the revenues would substantially increase support seems very robust and is confirmed by Dresner et al. (2006b), Hsu et al. (2008), Schade and Schlag (2003), Schuitema and Steg (2008), Steg et al. (2006) and Thalmann (2004).”
Discussing Equity and Social Exclusion in Accessibility Evaluations (2011, background): “Not only the distribution effects but also the acceptability of such policies can strongly be influenced by revenue use (Schuitema and Steg, 2008).”