The Entrepreneurial Personality in the Context of Resources, Environment, and the Startup Process—A Configurational Approach
By Christian Korunka, Hermann Frank, Manfred Lueger, Josef Mugler. 2003
474 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5008095f663810d40feb08f6e33786707eb3a2e0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Sascha Kraus
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Joakim Wincent
- Holger Patzelt
- Michael Frese
- Miriam Schüssler
- Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano
- Dean A. Shepherd
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Sascha Kraus
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Joakim Wincent
- Danny Miller
- Simone Chlosta
- Holger Patzelt
- Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano
- Miriam Schüssler
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of Personality Traits and Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business and Engineering Students (2019, background): “Also, entrepreneurs with a high level of achievement possess a powerful desire to find solutions for different problems by themselves, are enthusiastic, enjoy receiving feedback on their accomplishments, are constantly trying to improve their performance and are more likely to be successful in their”
- Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners (2005, background): “Moreover, individual-level personal initiative was shown to be positively related to business success in Europe (Korunka et al., 2003), in East Africa (Koop et al., 2000), and now in southern Africa.”
- Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 1: the missing link (2005, background): “…also include resource management and organisation; the ability to influence, and to generate support, from others; and the capability of assessing, shaping and developing ideas (Bird and Jelinek, 1988; Chandler and Hanks, 1994; Korunka et al., 2003; Sadler-Smith et al., 2003; Tidd et al., 2001).”
- Individual Entrepreneurial Intent: Construct Clarification and Development of an Internationally Reliable Metric (2009, background): “…of new business opportunities (Busenitz & Lau, 1996; Choi & Shepherd, 2004; Mitchell, Smith, Seawright, & Morse, 2000), and by broader environmental factors at both individual and national institutional levels (Hunger, Korsching, & Van Auken, 2002; Korunka et al., 2003; Westlund & Bolton, 2003).”
- Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach (2011, methodology): “The configuration approach can be used both in quantitative research ( Mugler et al. , 2003”
- Measuring Chinese entrepreneurial motivation: Personality and environmental influences (2007, methodology): “A recent example (based in part on Gartner's suggestion) was described by Korunka et al. (2003)”
- Entrepreneurship theories and Empirical research: A Summary Review of the Literature (2011, background): “…studies show that human capital factors are positively related to becoming a nascent entrepreneur(Kim, Aldrich & Keister, 2003,Davidson & Honing,2003, Korunka et al, 2003), increase opportunity recognition and even entrepreneurial success (Anderson & Miller, 2003,Davidson & Honing,2003).”
- Underdog Entrepreneurs: A Model of Challenge–Based Entrepreneurship (2017, background): “The entrepreneurship literature has identified some of these as locus of control, need for achievement, flexibility, extraversion, and other characteristics (Korunka et al., 2003; Miller, 1983).”
- The global entrepreneurship index (GEINDEX) (2010, unknown): “An innovative application of the configuration theory to entrepreneurship is presented by Korunka et al (2003).”
- Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method (2017, methodology): “Above all, it finally answers the question of how to empirically identify success paths proposed through the configuration approach theory (e.g., Mugler et al. 2003; Harms et al. 2009).”