Integrative perspectives on longitudinal investigations of leader development: From childhood through adulthood ☆

By D. Day. 2011

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ffc7fe2aa9151a37f1b78ad8cc3c7b6d533ba36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. H. Zacher
2. C. Rudolph
3. R. Rauvola
4. O. Epitropaki
5. Robin Martin
6. Thomas Sy
7. Susanna Tram-Quon
8. A. Topakas

In Safety Research

1. C. Rudolph
2. H. Zacher
3. R. Rauvola
4. O. Epitropaki
5. Robin Martin
6. Susanna Tram-Quon
7. A. Topakas
8. Thomas Sy

In Social Psychology

1. O. Epitropaki
2. C. Rudolph
3. Robin Martin
4. Thomas Sy
5. H. Zacher
6. R. Rauvola
7. Rachel E. Sturm
8. Susanna Tram-Quon

Citations in the corpus

• Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25years of research and theory (2014, background): “Another important difference is that the nature of leadership development is inherently multilevel and longitudinal (Day, 2011).”
• Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings (2013, methodology): “Gerstner and Day (1994) used the same list of 59 attributes generated by Lord et al.”
• Leadership and generations at work: A critical review (2017, methodology): “We see a great opportunity to unite our arguments for a differentiated lifespan developmental perspective on leadership by extending previous efforts in The Leadership Quarterly (e.g., Day, 2011; Walter & Scheibe, 2013) and elsewhere (e.g., Zacher et al., 2015).”