Objectifying Content Validity: Conducting a Content Validity Study in Social Work Research
By D. Rubio, M. Berg-Weger, S. Tebb, E. S. Lee, S. Rauch. 2003
1,477 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f202eddd0cdd14af2df86d52f00bdbdab65290b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Hsiu-Mei Huang
- Ulrich Rauch
- Shu-Sheng Liaw
- E. Delgado-Rico
- Hugo Carrctero-Dios
- Ella Miron-Spektor
- Anthony R. Artino Jr.
- Willibald F. Ruch
In General Health Professions
- Hunter Gehlbach
- Kent J. Dezee
- Jeffrey S. La Rochelle
- E. Delgado-Rico
- Hugo Carrctero-Dios
- Anthony R. Artino Jr.
- Willibald F. Ruch
Citations in the corpus
- Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: avances teóricos y métodos para su estimación (2013, background): “…IVC presenta un conjunto de beneficios que señalan su adecuación a la hora de estimar la validez de contenido, se considera el método elaborado por Rubio et al (2003) como uno de los más completos y exhaustivos, si bien, por el contrario, es posible considerar que se extralimita en su cometido,…”
- Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem Is How We Think about the Problem (2017, background): “Inter-rater agreement (IRA = .84), content validity index (CVI = .92) and the factorial validity index (FVI = .93) among the four experts (Rubio et al., 2003) were all in acceptable ranges for the items.”
- Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87 (2014, background): “For details on how to calculate and interpret these indices, see McKenzie et al. (1999) and Rubio et al. (2003).”
- Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach (2010, background): “The response form contains three columns (Rubio et al., 2003) that including representation, clarity, and comprehension for measuring each item.”
- Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales (2015, background): “Así, no puede olvidarse que los ítems son la concreción operativa de los componentes a evaluar y que de ítems inadecuados surge una delimitación operativa errónea, es decir, una deficiente validez de contenido (Rubio et al., 2003).”