Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales

547 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Criteria of the peer review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research in Psychology: A guide for creating research papers (2006, background): “The present set of norms concerns to experimental and quasi-experimental research publications -specific criteria can be find in Bobenrieth (2002), for Health Sciences; Buela-Casal and Sierra (2002), for Clinical Psychology; Carretero-Dios and Pérez (2005), for instrumentation and measurement; and i”
Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: considerations about test selection in psychological research (2007, background): “The recommendations are articulated into six sections, each of which corresponds to a crucial stage in the process of test construction/adaptation (for greater detail, see Carretero-Dios and Pérez, 2005, or a summary in Annex 1).”