Evaluation of the digestible value of lupin and soybean protein concentrates and isolates when fed to rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, using either stripping or settlement faecal collection methods

By B. Glencross, D. D. Evans, K. Dods, P. McCafferty, Wayne Hawkins, R. Maas, S. Sipsas. 2005

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dietary protein source significantly alters growth performance, plasma variables and hepatic gene expression in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed amino acid balanced diets (2012, background): “a viable choice and aspects such as inclusion levels, ingredient digestibility, presence of anti-nutritional factors, nutrient balance and ingredient processing have been evaluated (Aksnes et al., 2006; Barrows et al., 2008; Gatlin et al., 2007; Glencross et al., 2005; Gomes et al., 1995; Halver and”
Apparent protein and energy digestibility of common and alternative feed ingredients by Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua (Linnaeus, 1758) (2006, background): “(Glencross et al., 2005; Peach, 2005).”
Apparent Digestibility of Gross Nutrients from Feedstuffs in Extruded Feeds for Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (2008, background): “Glencross et al. (2004, 2005) reported protein digestibility values of 98–107% for soy protein concentrate (SPC) and 98% for soy protein isolate in two trials with rainbow trout.”
A feed is only as good as its ingredients – a review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds (2007, methodology): “Ingredients such as vitamin-free casein, enzymatically hydrolysed casein and wheat gluten have been used for this purpose (Morales et al. 1994; Glencross & Hawkins 2004; Glencross et al. 2005) to help standardize digestibility assessments over time.”