Relationships between Innovation Stimulus, Innovation Capacity, and Innovation Performance

By Daniel I. Prajogo, Pervaiz K. Ahmed. 2006

708 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e76ef30b3ef863ff1020db972cf9508875b015d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Hoa Do
2. Nicholas O'Regan
3. Víctor Jesús García-Morales
4. Encarnación García‐Sánchez
5. Rodrigo Martín-Rojas
6. Guus Berkhout
7. Konstantinos C. Kostopoulos
8. P. Trott

In Marketing

1. Hoa Do
2. Charmi Patel
3. P. Budhwar
4. Nicholas O'Regan
5. Víctor Jesús García-Morales
6. Encarnación García‐Sánchez
7. Rodrigo Martín-Rojas
8. Guus Berkhout

In Strategy and Management

1. Feng Liu
2. Weizheng Yu
3. Yue Shang
4. Charmi Patel
5. P. Budhwar
6. Hoa Do
7. M. Papachroni
8. Nicholas O'Regan

Citations in the corpus

• Connecting technological capabilities with market needs with a cyclic model of innovation (2010, positive): “In a recent study examining the relationship involving innovation stimulus, innovation capacity and innovation performance, Prajogo and Ahmed (2006) found that there was a strong relationship between innovation stimulus and innovation capacity and a strong relationship between innovation capacity an”
• Innovation capability for SME success: perspectives of financial and operational performance (2014, background): “Prajogo and Ahmed (2006) discuss the technological factors of innovation management and human factors of innovation management.”
• Intellectual Capital, Technological Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector (2019, background): “Prajogo and Ahmed [105] suggested that a good environment for supporting innovation should be created and maintained within firms.”
• Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Performance: a Systematic Review of the Literature (2012, background): “Selected studies focusing on the analysis of IC on innovation process (Prajogo & Ahmed, 2006), innovation outcome (Jassawalla & Sashitall, 1998; Prajogo & Ahmed, 2006; Smith et al., 2005; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; Wu et al., 2007) and performance (Hayton, 2005; Mol & Birkinshaw, 2009; Tseng et…”
• Relationship between innovation‐led HR policy, strategy, and firm performance: A serial mediation investigation (2018, background): “Innovation is a must for many firms to strive in the current market turbulence (Prajogo & Ahmed, 2006), and thus innovation strategies are becoming increasingly important for firms to improve their innovation performance.”
• Product innovation, budgetary control, and the financial performance of firms (2011, background): “Consequently, product innovation is often characterized as being critically important to a firm’s performance (e.g. Balkin, Markman, & Gomez-Mejia, 2000; Cho & Pucik, 2005; Li & Atuahene-Gima, 2001; Prajogo & Ahmed, 2006).”
• How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital transformation era (2022, methodology): “A popular distinction is between product innovation and process innovation (Hullova et al., 2016; Prajogo and Ahmed, 2006).”
• Influence of Technological Assets on Organizational Performance through Absorptive Capacity, Organizational Innovation and Internal Labour Flexibility (2018, positive): “Similarly, new product and process outcomes from organizational innovation processes contribute to creating new initiatives that primarily reflect the firm’s realized absorptive capacity [14,78], especially in the field of technology companies, where technological assets endure [7,17] and enable thi”