To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys.

By E. D. Leeuw. 2005

940 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e09d55e25393eb22b47c4b0d82d4dfa84bc24d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

An evaluation of the weighting procedures for an online access panel survey (2008, background): “The control over the pace and flow of a face-to-face interview lies primarily with the interviewer, but it is the respondent who chooses when, where and at what pace online questions are answered (de Leeuw 1992:26-29; de Leeuw 2005:244).”
Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet (2009, background): “Experiments have shown that respondents to surveys are more likely to offer socially desirable answers and to demonstrate acquiescence in the presence of an interviewer than in the self-administered situation (de Leeuw, 1992, 2005; Schuman and Presser, 1981).”
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review (2010, background): “Mixed mode surveys, in theory, combine the strengths of each mode of surveys, so that the optimal balance among cost, total survey errors, and survey ethnics and privacy is achieved (de Leeuw, 2005; Dillman & Tarnai, 1988).”
Selection Bias in Web Surveys (2010, unknown): “De Leeuw (2005) describes two-mixed approaches.”
Web-Face-to-Face Mixed-Mode Design in a Longitudinal Survey: Effects on Participation Rates, Sample Composition, and Costs (2017, background): “Combining different modes within a survey has long been thought to provide opportunities to benefit from the strength of each mode (de Leeuw 2005).”
Does Giving People Their Preferred Survey Mode Actually Increase Survey Participation Rates? An Experimental Examination (2012, background): “A mixed mode survey design is one in which two or more modes are offered to sampled units to recruit respondents and measure their responses (de Leeuw 2005; Dillman, Smyth, and Christian 2009).”
Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes (2011, unknown): “7 See de Leeuw (2005) and Atkeson et al.”
The Future of Modes of Data Collection (2011, background): “There are many different ways to mix modes of data collection (see de Leeuw 2005), and the way in which different modes are combined can have an effect on all sources of survey error and costs.”
Assessing response styles across modes of data collection (2008, background): “In summary, crossmode surveys in general and Web surveys in particular are on the rise (De Leeuw 2005; Deutskens et al. 2006). An important barrier facing cross-mode research lies in the potential cross-mode bias due to response styles. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. (2008) 36:409–422”