An evaluation of the weighting procedures for an online access panel survey

By Geert Loosveldt, Nathalie Sonck. 2008

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6232d39fe10d3147d250ed5b754102c8970fb88

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Dieter Hoffmann
2. Timothy R. Levine
3. G. Szolnoki

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Vaughn J. Crichlow
2. Dieter Hoffmann
3. Kim B. Serota
4. Jamie A. Snyder
5. Timothy R. Levine
6. G. Szolnoki
7. J. Smykla
8. Franklin J. Boster

Citations in the corpus

• The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported Lies (2010, background): “However, noncoverage and self-selection can create sampling problems in Web-based research that weighting does not solve (Loosveldt & Sonck, 2008).”
• Community Perceptions of Police Body-Worn Cameras (2017, background): “Poststratification mitigates the potential bias caused by a nonrepresentative sample (Hahs-Vaughn & Lomax, 2006; Little, 1993; Loosveldt & Sonck, 2008).”
• Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research (2013, background): “Thus, the current practice for creating a sample representative is to weight variables in respect to socio-demographic characteristics as well as different attitudes (Loosveldt and Sonck, 2008; Lee and Valliant, 2009).”