Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing Perspective

By Joseph P. Forgas, Jennifer M. George. 2001

938 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ca557503af8d7f15e13cddfce6c32af208e02f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

THE ROLE OF AFFECTIVE EXPERIENCE IN WORK MOTIVATION. (2004, neutral): “In general, so called cognitively based motivation theories (i.e., those that discuss “cold” rather than “hot” processes) have been predominant in scholarly understandings of work motivation (cf. Forgas & George, 2001;Staw, 1984).”
The role of self-efficacy, goal, and affect in dynamic motivational self-regulation (2009, result): “Consistent with a large accumulation of previous studies (see George & Brief, 1996; Forgas & George, 2001; Seo et al., 2004; for reviews), our results showed that positive and negative affect experienced during the process of motivational self-regulation was significantly associated with self-effi”
Does Anger Expression Help or Harm Leader Effectiveness? The Role of Competence-based versus Integrity-based Violations and Abusive Supervision (2017, background): “Through the affective pathway, emotional expressions elicit affective and visceral reactions in observers (Barsade, 2002; Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994), which in turn have downstream consequences for observers’ behaviors through various forms of affect infusion (Forgas & George, 2001).”
The Energizing Nature of Work Engagement: Toward a New Need-Based Theory of Work Motivation (2017, background): “Other research has shown that positive moods predict reduced absenteeism (Forgas & George, 2001) and increased variety seeking in complex situations (Isen, 2001).”
Being important matters: The impact of work and family centralities on the family-to-work conflict–satisfaction relationship (2012, background): “As individuals process and evaluate information in a manner consistent with their affective states, more psychological strain as a result of FWC may lead to less favorable evaluations of one’s job (Forgas and George, 2001; Graves et al., 2007).”
Affective Service Display and Customer Mood (2005, background): “Surprisingly, the current study did not provide support for the notion of mood congruency (see Forgas and George 2001).”
Enterprise Ritual: A Theory of Entrepreneurial Emotion and Exchange (2008, neutral): “The existence of such relatively enduring feelings of pleasantness/unpleasantness is well supported in the literature, sometimes labelled mood (e.g., Forgas, 1992; Lazarus, 1991; Forgas and George, 2001; Kelly and Barsade, 2001; Watson and Tellegen, 1985).”
Building better work places through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process (2008, background): “It has become increasingly clear that affect, mood and emotions can have a profound influence on organizational behavior, decision-making, and judgments (Forgas & George, 2001).”