Contrast and Assimilation Effects of Dimensional Comparisons in Five Subjects: An Extension of the I/E Model.

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Meta-Analysis of Relations Between Achievement and Self-Concept (2020, methodology): “Similarly, analyzing comparison effects across five academic domains, Jansen et al. (2015) showed negative coefficients of mathematics, physics, and chemistry achievement on German (L1) self-concept.”
Dimensional comparisons: How academic track students’ achievements are related to their expectancy and value beliefs across multiple domains (2018, background): “With respect to expectancies, our findings largely replicated previous research on dimensional comparisons (Jansen et al., 2015; Marsh, Lüdtke, et al., 2015) with strong support for negative cross-domain paths between far domains—indicating contrast”
Extending expectancy-value theory predictions of achievement and aspirations in science: Dimensional comparison processes and expectancy-by-value interactions (2017, result): “For cross-subject relations, they revealed slightly negative contrast effects between biology and physics but assimilation effects between chemistry and physics (for similar results, also see Jansen et al., 2015).”