The Effects of Democratic Leadership on Group Member Satisfaction

By R. Foels, James E. Driskell, Brian Mullen, Eduardo Salas. 2000

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b30c3e7e4784b29ada4de184545133cc86a2a6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. M. V. van Engen
2. A. Eagly
3. Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt
4. Annebel H. B. De Hoogh
5. Lindred L. Greer
6. David de Cremer
7. Deanne N. den Hartog
8. R. Kark

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. A. Eagly
2. M. V. van Engen
3. Deanne N. den Hartog
4. Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt
5. Lindred L. Greer
6. Annebel H. B. De Hoogh
7. David de Cremer
8. D. van Knippenberg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. V. van Engen
2. Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt
3. A. Eagly
4. Lindred L. Greer
5. Deanne N. den Hartog
6. Annebel H. B. De Hoogh
7. David de Cremer
8. D. van Knippenberg

Citations in the corpus

• The Leadership Styles of Women and Men (2001, background): “Meta-analyses reviewing the effects of democratic and autocratic leadership on group productivity and membership satisfaction have confirmed the importance of moderating conditions ( Foels, Driskell, Mullen, & Salas, 2000; Gastil, 1994).”
• Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. (2003, methodology): “Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men”
• Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? An investigation of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team performance (2015, background): “Indeed, Foels et al. (2000) point out that by providing direction and clarity, autocratic leaders may offer team members ease and peace of mind.”
• Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership (2006, background): “1 Foels et al. (2000) found a small tendency for groups to be more satisfied with democratic vs. autocratic leadership, but the strength of this”