A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations
By T. Baker, Eric Gedajlovic, M. Lubatkin. 2005
416 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b09fabb96e65e1154673e081452864995ba7495
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- Ute Stephan
- P. Muñoz
- Jonathan Kimmitt
- M. Obschonka
- Joakim Wincent
- Friederike Welter
- J. Hessels
- Saul Estrin
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Ute Stephan
- Nicole Coviello
- Shaker A. Zahra
- Lianxi Zhou
- Oliver Gassmann
- David B. Audretsch
- Marcus M. Keupp
- G. Knight
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Nicole Coviello
- Lianxi Zhou
- Shaker A. Zahra
- G. Knight
- Ute Stephan
- Friederike Welter
- Yee Kwan Tang
- J. Hessels
Citations in the corpus
- Taxes, corruption, and entry (2016, neutral): “Higher transaction costs imposed by corruption could put an extra burden on entrepreneurs (Coase 1960) and impact perceptions about “the portion of the value that ventures create that the entrepreneur is able to capture for their own purposes” (Baker et al. 2005: 497).”
- International Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis (2011, background): “Conceptually, Baker et al. (2005) develop arguments on the role of social and cultural context in the discovery-evaluation-exploitation process.”
- Rural entrepreneurship in place: an integrated framework (2019, background): “This draws together ideas that formal business apparatus such as access to finance remains relevant (Baker et al. 2005) but it must be complemented by ideas that underpin rural life and notions of “rural fabric”, which in Garrod et al.”
- Entrepreneurship Amid Concurrent Institutional Constraints in Less Developed Countries (2016, background): “Thus, the assessment of opportunity may only occur when the entrepreneur has reconciled the uncertainty prompted by a flawed institutional environment versus the strategic choices available to shape their entrepreneurial trajectory (Baker et al., 2005).”
- Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship (2014, background): “…marginalization have to cope with an internal dissatisfaction that forces them to make the venture-creation decision in its self-employment form (Baker et al., 2005; Please cite this article as: Thai, M.T.T., Turkina, E., Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal…”
- A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, search Processes and Ethical Challenges (2009, background): “For instance, what is the social value of cleanwater in remote villages, the adoption of orphans from wartorn nations or the empowerment of women entrepreneurs in oppressive societies? Further complicating the task of determining social wealth is the subjective nature of social value itself, which v”
- Human capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship (2016, background): “Therefore the national institutional framework affects individual choices about engagement in entrepreneurship, including entry into social as against commercial entrepreneurship (Baker et al., 2005; Estrin et al., 2013a, b).”
- Age, culture, and self-employment motivation (2015, background): “For example, from a legitimacy perspective (Autio et al. 2013), the same practices that inhibit desirability for entrepreneurial entry have been found to enhance feasibility beliefs and growth orientation (Baker et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2012).”
- The Embeddedness of Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding Variation Across Local Communities (2010, neutral): “Whereas earlier work on entrepreneurship (Johannisson and Nilsson, 1989; Jack and Anderson, 2002; Baker, Gedajlovic, and Lubatkin, 2005) accounts for differences in entrepreneurial initiatives across local institutional settings, research on social entrepreneurship has yet to pay systematic…”
- Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption (2009, background): “Its exclusion, moreover, suggests that the appropriability problem has little effect on the economic valuation of an opportunity (Acs and Audretsch, 2005; Baker et al., 2005; Milgrom and Roberts, 1990).”