Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption

By Sergey Anokhin, W. Schulze. 2009

743 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15234d6ecf2a4497a51aeb9ee4981711a3d5b8f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Taxes, corruption, and entry (2016, neutral): “There is growing consensus that corruption hurts entrepreneurs (Anokhin and Schulze 2009; Aidis et al. 2012; Acs et al. 2008), but its indirect influence on tax policy is a more complicated matter.”
Individual–Level Resources and New Business Activity: The Contingent Role of Institutional Context (2013, background): “Such control is an important predictor of new business activity, because limiting corruption reduces the uncertainty that new businesses encounter (Anokhin & Schulze, 2009).”
Does corruption ever help entrepreneurship? (2016, neutral): “…and realized innovation measures) and a measure of control of corruption from the World Governance Indicators for 64 countries from 1996 to 2002, Anokhin and Schulze (2009), for example, conclude that corruption is harmful to entrepreneurship and innovation, the driving source of economic…”
The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem) and Its Impact on Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “Anokhin and Schulze (2009) focus on the quality of institutions, and in particular investigate whether diminishing corruption could lead to entrepreneurs being more productive to society.”
Do political connections matter for firm innovation? Evidence from emerging markets in Central Asia and Eastern Europe (2020, background): “innovation (Veracierto, 2008; Anokhin and Schulze, 2009; Alam et al. 2018), there are a number of studies which suggest that corruption can equally create new opportunities for economic gains (Asiedu and Freeman, 2009; Krammer 2019).”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Authors such as Anokhin and Schulze (2009), Bruno et al. (2013), Calcagno and Sobel (2014), Klapper et al. (2006), Román et al. (2011), Stephen et al. (2009), Van de Ven (1993) and van Stel et al. (2007) have used this theory to understand how entrepreneurship can be configured ex-ante and ex-post;…”
Entrepreneurship and well-being: Past, present, and future (2019, background): “, 2002), the costs of widespread corruption (Anokhin and Schulze, 2009), and the effects of taxes (Bruce and Mohsin, 2006) that affect not only financial outcomes, but likely affect other aspects of well-being.”
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: The Need for Innovative and Institutional Solutions (2017, neutral): “1 1 1 1 1 ln ln ln n n it iY ij it j j it j i t j it j j Y X Y ECT ψ α β λ ε − − − − − = = Δ = + Δ + Δ + + ∑ ∑ (5)”
Does Corporate Governance Influence Earnings Management in Latin American Markets? (2014, background): “asymmetry information that characterize the economic activity (Anokhin and Schulze 2008).”
Corruption and destructive entrepreneurship (2017, positive): “Our study also builds on an emerging line of research in the entrepreneurship literature that has linked corruption with rates of entrepreneurship and innovation across countries (Anokhin and Schulze 2009).”