Trust, Risk and Betrayal

By I. Bohnet, Richard J. Zeckhauser. 2004

822 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4af94adc7651e267ca82f0c219e696a87a48761c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Economics and Econometrics

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Do strong family ties inhibit trust (2008, background): “…that, when the outcome depends on the behaviour of others, risk is perceived differently, and may reflect ‘exploitation or betrayal aversion’ (Bohnet and Zeckhauser, 2004; Bohnet et al., 2008): R’s aversion to being taken advantage of by E is different from the risk of losing in a game of…”
Social comparison and risky choices (2009, neutral): “Such studies have, among other things, found that uncertainty caused by others—strategic uncertainty—leads to more risk averse behavior than other types of uncertainty (Bohnet and Zeckhauser 2004).”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “More specifically, one line of research showed that participants are less willing to take a risk in trust situations compared with nonsocial risk situations (Baumgartner et al., 2008; Bohnet et al., 2008; Bohnet & Zeckhauser, 2004; Kosfeld et al., 2005).”
Civic Capital as the Missing Link (2010, background): “Notice however that the correlation is far from perfect, suggesting that indirect indicators are affected by measurement error. Hence if one were to rely on measures of this sort in applied work, one could gain some insights by obtaining several indirect indicators and looking at common components (”
Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game (2010, background): “to attitudes towards risk (see, e.g., Bohnet and Zeckhauser, 2004, for additional”
COMBINED EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL IDENTIFICATION ON THE RECIPROCITY DYNAMIC FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (2009, background): “…on betrayal suggests that employees may be especially likely to engage in retaliatory behavior in response to betrayal from others with whom they feel relationally close (Bohnet & Zeckhauser, 2004; Brockner, Tyler, & Copper-Schneider, 1992; Elangovan & Shapiro, 1998; Koehler & Gershoff, 2003).”
Dictating the Risk: Experimental Evidence on Giving in Risky Environments (2013, background): “Relatedly, Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) and Bohnet et al. (2008) analyze how recipients in a risky dictator game adjust acceptance rates depending on whether an actual person or a random process determines the outcome of the game.”
Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States: Comment (2010, methodology): “Yet as already suggested by Bohnet et al.'s (2008) results, we do not observe this (Finding 2).”
Decomposing trust and trustworthiness (2006, background): “Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) suggest that in addition to attitudes to risk, attitudes to betrayal have to be taken into account in the trust game.”
Is trust a risky decision (2004, background): “5 Bohnet and Zeckhauser (this volume) present subjects with a similar choice task as one of their three treatments, but their clever approach elicits minimum acceptable probabilities over the risky outcomes. 6 For more information on these scales and analysis of the results see Eckel and Wilson (200”
The Structure of Human Prosociality (2016, background): “The extent of giving, trust, and punishment was comparable to previous reports (Bohnet & Zeckhauser, 2004; Camerer, 2003; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2004).”
Do leniency policies facilitate collusion? Experimental evidence (2015, result): “We summarize our predictions for RD as follows: 28This observation is in line with Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) who suggest that subjects are prone to betrayal aversion, i.e., they dislike situations where another agent may turn the outcome of the game to one's disadvantage.”
Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. (2007, result): “Reciprocal and inequity averse subjects derive a special disutility from betrayal of trust, along with the associated economic loss, which is consistent with behavi oral studies [45] indi cating a pure aversion to social betrayal.”
Trust and Information Sharing in Supply Chains (2012, background): “Lastly, Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) compared a trust game with a probabilistic decision process.”
Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States (2008, methodology): “Following the design introduced by Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004), we focus on binary-choice tasks in three decision situations: the trust game, the risky dictator game, and the decision problem.”