Decomposing trust and trustworthiness

By Nava Ashraf, I. Bohnet, Nikita Piankov. 2006

626 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09c1b9dbb690dd228e0b523c0574b6709887e696

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Measuring conditional cooperation: a replication study in Russia (2009, result): “The same shares of conditional cooperators in our four locations and the data from Fischbacher et al. (2001) is also consistent with a host of trust experiments that compared Russian student and non-student subjects to Western subjects and found no or only small differences in trustworthiness (Fehr ”
Trust and Wellbeing (2010, positive): “This significant underestimation of the trustworthiness of others, as confirmed by many experiments (e.g. Ashraf et al. 2006, Fetchenhauer and Dunning 2009) also has parallels in crime statistics18.”
Signaling can increase consumers' willingness to pay for green products. Theoretical model and experimental evidence (2019, neutral): “In fact, it has been shown empirically that unconditional kindness correlates with trustworthiness (Ashraf et al., 2006; Gambetta & Przepiorka, 2014).”
Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World (2008, background): “At one extreme, the South African students in the Ashraf et al. (2006a) study do not send very much as the first-mover and return significantly less than what is sent to them as second-movers.”
Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them (2010, background): “15 Ashraf et al. (2006) and Sapienza et al. (2007) find a strong effect from ‘‘unconditional kindness,” also derived from a dictator game.”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “…or the prisoner’s dilemma game were more likely to trust than individuals with a proself SVO or a low willingness to cooperate in either game (Ashraf et al., 2006; Ben-Ner & Halldorsson, 2010; Bohnet & Baytelman, 2007; Chaudhuri & Gangadharan, 2007; Cox, 2004; Etang et al., 2011;…”