Is trust a risky decision

By Catherine C. Eckel, Rick K. Wilson. 2004

530 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b6302b2bb4990d0b9284afb2a0c67e41b46289a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes (2016, unknown): “…Carlsson et al. (2012) in the field, and Andersen et al. (2006); Baker et al. (2008); Chakravarty et al. (2011); Drichoutis and Koundouri (2012); Eckel and Wilson (2004); Ehmke et al. (2010); Harrison et al. (2013); Houser et al. (2010); Mueller and Schwieren (2012); Ponti and Carbone (2009);…”
Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game (2010, background): “For example, Eckel and Wilson (2004) investigate how behavior in two-person sequential, binary trust games correlates with a variety of behavioral and survey-based risk measures.”
Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes in the Lab: Task or Ask? An Empirical Comparison (2015, unknown): “Moreover, with the growing body of experimental studies in the social sciences in general and in economics in particular (see Falk and Heckman, 2009, for a discussion), individual risk attitudes have also been linked empirically to a good many behavioural patterns.”
Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them (2010, background): “…attitude score, increasing in risk aversion, was derived from responses to a series of choices for an amount with certainty, or a 50/50 chance of getting a similar, higher or lower amount in the manner of Eckel and Wilson (2004); participants were paid randomly for one of their choices.8 Faith –”
Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups (2007, background): “…behavior of different age groups in our trust game is not likely to be driven by differences in risk attitudes we would like to refer to a paper by Eckel and Wilson (2004) where they show that there is no statistical relationship between several behavioral risk measures and the decision to trust…”
Trust, Positive Reciprocity, and Negative Reciprocity: Do These Traits Impact Entrepreneurial Dynamics? (2010, background): “On the other hand, trust also contains a risk factor (see e.g. Eckel and Wilson, 2004).”
Do strong family ties inhibit trust (2008, result): “We also asked a similar question about ‘general willingness to take risks’ (also from GSOEP), and find that it does not affect trust behaviour, a result consistent with Eckel and Wilson (2004), but not with Sapienza et al. (2007) or Schechter (2007).”
Trust in Forecast Information Sharing (2011, background): “For example, Eckel and Wilson (2004) find in their experiments that trusting behavior is not related to risky choices and risk preferences as was suggested by Ben-Ner and Putterman (2001).”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, methodology): “…& Eysenck, 1978) as well as various behavioral measures such as the multiple price list method (Holt & Laury, 2002), the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART; Lejuez et al., 2002), the card gamble task (Eckel & Wilson, 2004), and the Bomb Risk Elicitation Task (BRET; Crosetto & Filippin, 2013).”
What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything? (2008, background): “…human nature” (Uslaner 2002, p. 17), an (affective or emotional) attitude ( Jones 1996, Miller 2000), a relationship (Hardin 2001, 2002, 2003, 2006), a decision (Bohnet & Zeckhauser 2004, Eckel & Wilson 2004, Herreros 2004), an action (Sztompka 1999), or a kind of (social) capital (Sztompka 1999)?”
Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: An experiment in rural paraguay (2007, unknown): “Two people with the same (non-zero) level of trust, but different levels of risk aversion will play the role of trustor differently (Karlan, 2005; Eckel and Wilson, 2004).”