Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game

By Daniel Houser, Daniel W. Schunk, Joachim Winter. 2010

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa922921f8bf93a20d8d3010e84fc3a6370bf831

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Benjamin E. Hilbig
2. Isabel Thielmann

In Safety Research

1. Isabel Thielmann
2. Benjamin E. Hilbig
3. Ingo Zettler

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Isabel Thielmann
2. Benjamin E. Hilbig

Citations in the corpus

• Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “Similarly, information about an interaction partner’s likely back transfer reduced the (albeit small) impact of risk aversion on trust behavior (Houser et al., 2010).”
• Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes in the Lab: Task or Ask? An Empirical Comparison (2015, unknown): “…Snjiders and Keren, 1998, or Ben-Ner and Putterman, 2001), Eckel and Wilson (2004) reported that their risk instruments (including the Holt and Laury measure) could not predict the decision to trust in a binary trust game (for similar results, see Bohnet and Zeckhauser, 2004; Houser et al., 2010).”
• A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes (2016, unknown): “…(2006); Baker et al. (2008); Chakravarty et al. (2011); Drichoutis and Koundouri (2012); Eckel and Wilson (2004); Ehmke et al. (2010); Harrison et al. (2013); Houser et al. (2010); Mueller and Schwieren (2012); Ponti and Carbone (2009); Viscusi et al. (2011) and Masclet et al. (2009) in the lab.”