New Benchmarks in Higher Education: Student Engagement in Online Learning

By C. C. Robinson, Hallett Hullinger. 2008

565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a650a6d580bd00f18b22e9440106254fdbb6e43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? (2010, background): “edu/~josotl 2 online students report learning more and spending more time on task (Robertson, Grant, and Jackson, 2005), being more engaged than traditional students according to the NSSE (National Survey of Student Engagement) averages (Robinson and Hullinger, 2008), having higher achievement and p”
The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives (2020, background): “Aside from technical issues, our study participants ’ experiences were influenced by the individual characteristics of students themselves, such as their learning styles, acceptance of new learning modalities, and levels of engagement in online classes [43 – 45].”
Student retention and engagement in higher education (2020, background): “…BrckaLorenz, and Shoup 2018; Thiele et al. 2017; Wyatt 2011), international students (e.g. Glass et al. 2017; Lee, Kim, andWu 2018; Zhao, Kuh, and Carini 2005), online/distance learners (e.g. Bolliger and Halupa 2018; Robinson and Hullinger 2008) and students with disabilities (DuPaul et al. 2017).”
Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: the role of reflexivity (2016, unknown): “Robinson and Hullinger (2008) also established how an online learning environment can incorporate asynchronous interactions between learners and tutors in order to engage learners.”
Factors Affecting Perceived Learning, Satisfaction, and Quality in the Online MBA: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach (2015, background): “In a study of undergraduate business students enrolled in at least one totally online course, Robinson and Hullinger (2008) found that students who reported greater levels of satisfaction with online learning also reported attaining more academic skill development (e.g., writing and critical…”
Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019, background): “Besides above, the effectiveness could also be influenced by characteristics of students themselves, such as gender, learning style [37], attitude [38], satisfaction [39] and level of engagement [40].”
Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement (2018, background): “A few studies have suggested that technology can have positive effects on student engagement (Chen et al. 2010; Henrie et al. 2015; Hu and Kuh 2001; Junco et al. 2013; Nelson Laird et al. 2005; Robinson and Hullinger 2008) and time spent in cocurricular activities (Junco 2012).”
An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education (2018, background): “…1 – March 2018 184 engagement research in the past has “devoted relatively little attention to online learning” (p. 66), a view supported by others (e.g., Robinson & Hullinger, 2008), and Hampton and Pearce (2016) noted that being focused and engaged in course work as an online student is critical…”
Student Attitudes Towards Online Education during the COVID-19 Viral Outbreak of 2020: Distance Learning in a Time of Social Distance (2020, background): “While online learning technologies offer much potential for student engagement, it may differ from on-campus and in person learning (Robinson & Hullinger, 2008).”
Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. (2018, background): “Revere and Kovach (2011) and Robinson and Hullinger (2008) suggest the use of new but well-established technologies, such as discussion boards, chat sessions, blogs, wikis, group tasks, Twitter, Skype, YouTube, and Ning networks, to foster student engagement through course design and technology…”
Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). (2015, background): “The NSSE benchmarks five clusters of activities indicating student engagement, including level of academic challenge, a supportive campus environment, enriching educational experiences, student–faculty interaction, and active and collaborative learning (Robinson & Hullinger, 2008).”
The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Participation on Students' Performance in Online Accounting Courses (2012, background): “The factors represent the degree to which students engaged with the online forums in terms of time and energy to study and master the course material (McBrien, Jones and Cheng, 2009; Robinson and Hullinger, 2008).”
A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction (2019, background): “…learners’ engagement and satisfaction based on the CoI framework can help guide practitioners in selecting appropriate strategies to promote the active engagement of learners and overall student satisfaction (Ma, Han, Yang, & Cheng, 2015; Richardson & Newby, 2006; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008).”