Moral chronicity and social information processing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to the moral personality

By D. Narvaez, D. Lapsley, S. Hagele, Benjamin M. Lasky. 2006

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a290e1f4180b2ce74f176a004ed0ab36bd56dfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Beyond Moral Reasoning: A Review of Moral Identity Research and Its Implications for Business Ethics (2008, unknown): “Power (2004) defined a just-community as one that provides opportunities for moral reflection and deliberation (e.”
On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition (2008, background): “Recent research has documented moral chronicity as an individual differences variable that influences social informationprocessing (Narvaez et al., 2006).”
Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique (2019, background): “In contrast, Narvaez’s schemas are brain structures that organize knowledge based on an individual’s experience (Narvaez et al. 2006).”
The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. (2009, methodology): “Using standard cognitive experimental paradigms, Narvaez and colleagues (2006, Study 1) showed, for example, that moral chronics reading " The accountant assists others with no expectation of a reward " performed better in a later cued recall task if the cue was a moral trait (e.g., kind) rather…”
The moral self: A review and integration of the literature (2015, background): “For instance, moral inferences strengthen moral chronicity (Narvaez et al., 2006).”
Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. (2009, background): “Because knowledge structures are acquired through life experiences that vary across persons, the importance or centrality of this moral self-schema to one’s overall self-conception also differs across individuals (Aquino & Reed, 2002; Blasi, 1980, 2004; Lapsley, 1996; Lapsley & Narvaez, 2004; Narva”
Identity, Reasoning, and Emotion: An Empirical Comparison of Three Sources of Moral Motivation (2006, methodology): “Such research may be possible, for example, by building on current work being conducted within the social cognitive framework ( Narvaez, Lapsley, Hagele, & Lasky, in press ).”
Religiosity and Moral Identity: The Mediating Role of Self-Control (2009, background): “Various nonconscious (e.g., religiosity) and conscious (e.g., selfcontrol) factors may then facilitate the activation of the mental representation of the moral self or moral identity (Forehand et al., 2002; Narvaez et al., 2006; Weaver and Agle, 2002).”