Moral Cognition: Explaining the Gender Difference in Antisocial Behavior

By Alvaro Q. Barriga, E. Morrison, Albert Kien Liau, John C. Gibbs. 2001

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4913ee342d8e25c5a8c05ef1a82aee4456c2c4da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Karl Aquino
2. Ruodan Shao
3. R. Diessner
4. Dan Freeman
5. Ravi Iyer
6. G. Carlo
7. S. Hardy
8. Jonathan Haidt

In Social Psychology

1. R. Diessner
2. Ravi Iyer
3. S. Hardy
4. Karl Aquino
5. G. Carlo
6. Jonathan Haidt
7. Ruodan Shao
8. Meghan M. Smith

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Karl Aquino
2. S. Hardy
3. Ruodan Shao
4. G. Carlo
5. Ravi Iyer
6. Dan Freeman
7. R. Diessner
8. M. Dijke

Citations in the corpus

• Being “in Control” May Make You Lose Control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior (2013, background): “Additionally, moral identity has been associated with decreased levels of immoral conduct, such as lying in business negotiations (Shao et al. 2008), lowered aggression on the football field (Sage et al. 2006), and less antisocial behavior among adolescents (Barriga et al. 2001).”
• Who engages with moral beauty? (2013, background): “…of the 5380 subjects from Study 1 who had completed the EBS, and four measures related to morality: the MIS (Aquino & Reed, 2002), the AGSC (Barriga et al. (2001), and the Fairness and Care subscales of the MFQ (Graham et al., 2011), while controlling for social desirability with the…”
• Moral judgement, cognitive distortions and empathy in incarcerated delinquent and community control adolescents (2006, background): “This is in line with the findings of Barriga et al. (2001), and supports the idea that cognitive distortions have a moderating role in the relation between moral maturity and antisocial behaviour.”
• Development of moral motivation from childhood to early adulthood (2007, unknown): “Some researchers use ratings of self-relevance of moral traits (‘considerate, honest, helpful, sympathetic, generous, sincere, fair, dependable’, Barriga et al., 2001; ‘caring, compassionate, fair, friendly, generous, helpful, hardworking, honest, kind’, Aquino & Reed, 2003).”
• Identity, Reasoning, and Emotion: An Empirical Comparison of Three Sources of Moral Motivation (2006, methodology): “measure of moral identity used in the present analysis seems consonant with this definition, is similar to measures used in prior research (Arnold, 1993; Barriga et al., 2001 ; P ratt et al., 2003), and has the benefit of being relatively straightforward, it does not seem to fully capture the compl”
• MTurk Character Misrepresentation: Assessment and Solutions (2017, background): “…(2) moral beliefs (MFQ: Graham et al. 2011); (3) material values (MVS: Richins 2004); (4) personality trait importance (GSA: adapted from Barriga et al. 2001); (5) extroversion and agreeableness (John and Srivastava 1999); (6) personality (TIPI: Gosling, Rentfrow, and Swann 2003); (7)…”
• Identity as a Source of Moral Motivation (2005, background): “…links between moral identity and prosocial behavior and commitment [e.g., Aquino & Reed, 2002; Arnold, 1993; Colby & Damon, 1992; Hart & Fegley, 1995; Reimer & Wade-Stein, 2004; Pratt et al., 2003; Reed & Aquino, 2003], with few exceptions [e.g., Aquino, Ray, & Reed, 2003; Barriga et al., 2001].”
• Beyond Moral Reasoning: A Review of Moral Identity Research and Its Implications for Business Ethics (2008, background): “Barriga et al. (2001) reported a similar association between moral self-relevance and antisocial behavior in a sample of late adolescents.”