Effects of Visibility between Speaker and Listener on Gesture Production: Some Gestures Are Meant to Be Seen

By Martha W. Alibali, Dana C. Heath, Heather Myers. 2001

443 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4865687b8e413d8468462d28838cc4cddfecada7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Martha W. Alibali
2. Autumn B. Hostetter
3. Sotaro Kita
4. Mitchell J. Nathan
5. Asli Ozyurek
6. Paul Ginns
7. Fang‐Tzu Hu
8. J. Bobis

In Language and Linguistics

1. Martha W. Alibali
2. Autumn B. Hostetter
3. Sotaro Kita
4. Asli Ozyurek
5. J. Gerwing
6. Judith Holler
7. R. Stevens
8. Mary Hegarty

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Sotaro Kita
2. Martha W. Alibali
3. Autumn B. Hostetter
4. Asli Ozyurek
5. Mitchell J. Nathan
6. Thomas Stephen Davies
7. Adam D. I. Kramer
8. Jiazhi Ou

Citations in the corpus

• To Disagree, We Must Also Agree: How Intersubjectivity Structures and Perpetuates Discourse in a Mathematics Classroom (2006, background): “We followed Alibali, Heath, and Myers (2001) in distinguishing representational gestures that addressed the content of speech from others, such as beats, that “[did] not present a discernible meaning” (McNeill, 1992, p. 80).”
• Do Speakers Design Their Cospeech Gestures for Their Addressees? The Effects of Addressee Location on Representational Gestures (2002, methodology): “By controlling for th ype of gesture and using a standardized ta Alibali et al. (2001) have shown that gestur that depict semantic content are used more quently when listeners are visible than wh they are not.”
• Gestures Over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks (2004, background): “In addition, most studies of representational gestures use an experimental paradigm in which a speaker narrates a story to a passive listener (e.g., Alibali, Health, & Meyers, 2001; McNeill, 1992).”
• Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement (2012, background): “Beat gestures allow the speaker to emphasize certain words and phrases and may also be linked with internal processes in speech formulation [2].”
• Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. (2008, methodology): “As shown in Table 1, only Alibali et al. (2001) and Bavelas et al. (1992, Exp.”
• What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking (2003, result): “The autonomy of information selection allows content discrepancy between speech and gesture that seem to systematically occur when the speaker presumably cannot decide what exactly to say and use gestures to explore the possibilities (Alibali et al., 2000; Church & Goldin-Meadow, 1986; Goldin-Meadow”
• The Effects of Visual Beats on Prosodic Prominence: Acoustic Analyses, Auditory Perception and Visual Perception. (2007, background): “A number of studies have shown that speakers not only gesture for their own benefit, such as to enhance lexical access (e.g., Rauscher, Krauss, & Chen, 1996), or to support thinking (e.g., Alibali, Kita, & Young, 2000), but also for their hearers (e.g., Alibali et al., 2001; O ¨ zyu ¨ rek, 2002).”
• Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. (2004, background): “Gestures are particularly associated with communication of spatial information [ 20 ,21].”