Do Speakers Design Their Cospeech Gestures for Their Addressees? The Effects of Addressee Location on Representational Gestures
By Asli Ozyurek. 2002
199 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/179122fa020a96faa923ddee3eb2167b2c859f2b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Roel M. Willems
- Sotaro Kita
- Asli Ozyurek
- Peter Hagoort
- Emiel Krahmer
- R. Stevens
- Marc Swerts
- J. Gerwing
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Roel M. Willems
- Sotaro Kita
- Asli Ozyurek
- Peter Hagoort
- Emiel Krahmer
- Judith Holler
- R. Stevens
- Marc Swerts
In Language and Linguistics
- Roel M. Willems
- Sotaro Kita
- Asli Ozyurek
- Peter Hagoort
- J. Gerwing
- Judith Holler
- R. Stevens
- Emiel Krahmer
Citations in the corpus
- The Effect of Common Ground on How Speakers Use Gesture and Speech to Represent Size Information (2007, result): “…examples of gesture use observed and described by Kendon (1985, 2004) supporting this theory, there has been corroborating experimental evidence (e.g., Alibali, Heath, & Meyers, 2001; Bavelas, Kenwood, Johnson, & Phillips, 2002; Beattie & Aboudan, 1994; Holler & Beattie, 2003; Özyürek, 2000, 2002).”
- On-line Integration of Semantic Information from Speech and Gesture: Insights from Event-related Brain Potentials (2007, methodology): “The iconic gestures used in this study were based on a larger database collected to investigate speakers’ natural and spontaneous use of speech and gestures in narratives of spatial events (Kita & Özyürek, 2003; Özyürek, 2002).”
- Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. (2008, background): “However, we were not seeking to undermine cognitive theories of gestures because, like many other gesture researchers, we do not see communicative and cognitive theories as incompatible (e.g., Bavelas, 1994; Özyürek, 2002; de Ruiter, 2000, 2006).”
- Neural reflections of meaning in gesture, language, and action (2009, methodology): “The neural evidence for the tight link between speech and gesture that we observed underscores the fact that in natural conversation speech and gesture are often tightly interconnected (McNeill 1992; Clark 1996; McNeill 2000; Özyürek 2002; Goldin Meadow 2003; Kita and Özyürek 2003; Kelly et al. 2004”
- The Effects of Visual Beats on Prosodic Prominence: Acoustic Analyses, Auditory Perception and Visual Perception. (2007, background): “A number of studies have shown that speakers not only gesture for their own benefit, such as to enhance lexical access (e.g., Rauscher, Krauss, & Chen, 1996), or to support thinking (e.g., Alibali, Kita, & Young, 2000), but also for their hearers (e.g., Alibali et al., 2001; Özyürek, 2002).”
- Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review (2009, background): “The way gestures use space as the representational medium changes, depending on various communicative and situational contexts (Gullberg, 2006; Holler & Stevens, 2007, 2009; Özyürek, 2002).”