Interdependence Analysis and the 3+1Cs in the Coach-Athlete Relationship.
By S. Jowett. 2007
241 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47ea1e074bcce91b7e8cebe14294a4b5cf6ceee3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- J. Côté
- S. Jowett
- R. Lorimer
- N. LaVoi
- Wade D. Gilbert
- Marc-André K. Lafrenière
- Henrik Gustafsson
- Noémie Carbonneau
In Social Psychology
- J. Côté
- S. Jowett
- Marc-André K. Lafrenière
- Robert J. Vallerand
- Noémie Carbonneau
- R. Lorimer
- N. LaVoi
- Clifford J. Mallett
Citations in the corpus
- An Integrative Definition of Coaching Effectiveness and Expertise (2009, background): “Jowett [39] proposed that the quality of coach-athlete relationships in providing appropriate resources in different sporting contexts is determined by the degree of closeness, commitment to the relationship, complementarity, and co-orientation between both parties.”
- Empathic Accuracy, Meta-Perspective, and Satisfaction in the Coach-Athlete Relationship (2009, background): “Sport is an ideal environment for the examination of interpersonal relationships, with frequent and varied social interactions, especially between coaches and their athletes (Carron & Bennett, 1988; Jowett, 2007).”
- Exploring the Contribution of the Caring Climate to the Youth Sport Experience (2010, background): “Other researchers (Jowett, 2007; LaVoi, 2007) have explored the dyadic relationship between coach and athlete.”
- Relational coaching in sport: Its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness (2016, background): “The coach-athlete relationship has been defined as the situation in which coaches and athletes’ feelings, thoughts and behaviours are mutually and causally interconnected (Jowett, 2007).”
- Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviors (2011, methodology): “This surge of research may be due to the recognition that the coacheathlete relationship is a crucial antecedent of athletes’ optimal functioning (Jowett, 2007; Jowett & Cockerill, 2003).”
- Empathic accuracy in coach–athlete dyads who participate in team and individual sports (2009, background): “More recently, Jowett et al. have proposed a model of the coach– athlete relationship that incorporates the interplay of coaches' and athletes' closeness, commitment, and complementarity (Jowett, 2005, 2007).”
- Athlete burnout: an integrated model and future research directions (2011, background): “The coach (cid:1) athlete relationship is probably the most intense relationship in sport contexts (cf. Jowett, 2007).”
- Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? (2014, methodology): “relationship using a coaching adaptation of the sport-orientated 3+1Cs (closeness, commitment, complementarity and co-orientation) relationship model (Jowett, 2007).”
- The Practices and Developmental Pathways of Professional and Olympic Serial Winning Coaches (2016, background): “828 The quality of the coach-athlete relationship has been highlighted as a key factor for 829 performance (Jowett, 2007).”
- Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads (2012, methodology): “The present study used an extension of IT known as the 3Cs model (Jowett, 2007) to examine coaches’ and athletes’ interdependence and satisfaction with their sport.”
- Expanding the Interpersonal Dimension: Closeness in the Coach-Athlete Relationship (2007, methodology): “, what do athletes perceive coaches actually do to garner trust and respect? Jowett [35] argues for examining direct and meta-perspectives between coaches and athletes to predict outcomes.”
- Motivational processes in the coach‐athlete relationship: A multi‐cultural self‐determination approach (2017, unknown): “A major advantage of the 3C's model is its emphasis on the bidirectional nature of the relationship which is manifested through the construct of co-orientation (Jowett, 2007; Lorimer & Jowett, 2010).”
- Relationship Maintenance Strategies in the Coach-Athlete Relationship: The Development of the COMPASS Model (2010, methodology): “Jowett (2005, 2007) developed the 3+1Cs conceptualization of the coach-athlete relationship based on a series of qualitative studies (e.g., Jowett & Cockerill, 2003; Jowett & Meek, 2000).”