A hierarchical structural analysis of perfectionism and its relation to other personality characteristics

By H. Stumpf, Wayne D. Parker. 2000

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47572be05fecabae449f4cf05887b00114215f61

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Citations in the corpus

Establishing construct validity evidence for the Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. (2006, result): “Purdon et al.; Sto ¨ber, 1998; Stumpf & Parker, 2000 ) have obtained similar findings.”
Self-esteem and perfectionism in elite athletes: effects on competitive anxiety and self-confidence (2002, background): “…and fear of failure) and positive dimensions (high personal standards, positive achievement strivings, followed by a sense of satisfaction and enhanced self-esteem); see, for example, Frost et al. (1990), Hamachek (1978), Stumpf and Parker (2000), and Terry-Short, Owens, Slade, and Dewey (1995).”
Perfectionistic concerns suppress associations between perfectionistic strivings and positive life outcomes (2010, background): “…1998), positive striving and maladaptive evaluative concerns (Frost, Heimberg, Holt, Mattia, & Neubauer, 1993), healthy and unhealthy perfectionism (Stumpf & Parker, 2000), conscientious and self-evaluative perfectionism (Hill et al., 2004), and positive and negative perfectionism (Terry-Short,…”
The influence of personality on HE students’ confidence in their academic abilities (2006, methodology): “on the research by Stober (1998) and Stumpf and Parker (2000) .”
Self-critical perfectionism and daily affect: dispositional and situational influences on stress and coping. (2003, background): “…to the Neuroticism factor of the Big Five and are more closely associated with the adaptive factor of Conscientiousness (Hill et al., 1997; Stumpf & Parker, 2000), it is not surprising that PS perfectionism is only problematic in conjunction with individual differences in certain…”
Perfectionism and competitive anxiety in athletes: Differentiating striving for perfection and negative reactions to imperfection (2007, background): “…(Stoeber & Otto, 2006): a dimension which has been described as positive, healthy, or adaptive perfectionism and a dimension which has been described as neurotic, unhealthy, or maladaptive perfectionism (Rice & Preusser, 2002; Stumpf & Parker, 2000; Terry-Short, Owens, Slade & Dewey, 1995).”
Development and Validation of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale–Brief (2016, background): “…always found to contain dimensions representative of EC and S, several investigations have found that the parental subscales (PE and PC) factor separately to form a third dimension (Hawkins, Watt, & Sinclair, 2006; Khawaja & Armstrong, 2005; Purdon, Antony, & Swinson, 1999; Stumpf & Parker, 2000).”
Maladaptive perfectionistic self-representations: The mediational link between psychological control and adjustment ☆ (2005, background): “…Standards scale was shown to load on a factor labeled Positive Striving (Bieling, Israeli, & Antony, 2004) or Adaptive Perfectionism (Cox, Enns, & Clara, 2002; Enns, Cox, & Clara, 2002; Stumpf & Parker, 2000), which was found to be either unrelated or positively related to individuals adjustment.”
Measuring Perfectionism in Sport, Dance, and Exercise: Review, Critique, Recommendations (2016, background): “Hill, Hall, Appleton, and Kozub (2008), for example, used contextualized versions of Self-Oriented Perfectionism and Socially Prescribed Perfectionism to examine perfectionism in sport, unconditional self-acceptance, and athlete burnout in junior soccer players.”
Perfectionism, self-efficacy and OCB: the moderating role of gender (2012, background): “Research suggests that perfectionism can best be construed as two chiefly independent dimensions that differentiate between positive and negative aspects of the construct (Slaney et al., 2001; Stumpf and Parker, 2000).”
Perfectionism and achievement goals in athletes: Relations with approach and avoidance orientations in mastery and performance goals (2008, background): “This dimension has been associated with positive outcomes, for example, higher academic performance, perceived ability to achieve, and endurance (Bieling, Israeli, Smith, & Antony, 2003; Enns, Cox, Sareen, & Freeman, 2001; Stumpf & Parker, 2000).”
Factors Influencing the Development of Perfectionism in Gifted College Students (2004, background): “…prescribed and self-oriented perfectionism, in another study researchers noted the parallel between neurotic forms of perfectionism and socially prescribed perfectionism, on the one hand, and between normal, or healthy forms and self-oriented perfectionism, on the other (Stumpf & Parker, 2000).”
Perfectionism, Implicit Theories of Intelligence, and Taiwanese Eighth-Grade Students’ Academic Engagement (2011, background): “Despite the well-documented deleterious effects of perfectionism, cumulative evidence indicates that the adaptive aspects of perfectionism need to be taken into account as well when investigating the very trait ( Hamachek, 1978 ; Slade & Owens, 1998 ; Stoeber, Harris, & Moon, 2007; Stumpf & Parker”
Perfectionism in young musicians: Relations with motivation, effort, achievement, and distress (2007, positive): “…and negative reactions to imperfections—and has shown close associations with negative characteristics and outcomes (see Stoeber & Otto, 2006 for a comprehensive review).1 Originally, the latter dimension also comprised perceived parental pressure (Frost et al., 1993; Stumpf & Parker, 2000).”