David M. Dunkley

Clinical Psychology · 2000–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 40 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom David M. Dunkley trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. K. Blankstein
  2. Gordon L. Flett
  3. R. B. Slaney
  4. E. Chang
  5. P. Hewitt
  6. Roz Shafran
  7. Kenneth G. Rice
  8. B. Priel
  9. M. Enns
  10. D. Zuroff

Who trusts David M. Dunkley overall

  1. K. Blankstein
  2. Simon B. Sherry
  3. D. Zuroff
  4. Martin M. Smith
  5. Joachim Stoeber
  6. Meifen Wei
  7. Paul Gilbert
  8. M. Aldea
  9. A. Hill
  10. Kenneth G. Rice

Papers from David M. Dunkley's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers David M. Dunkley trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Perfectionism as a Predictor of Positive and Negative Psychological Outcomes: Examining a Mediation Model in Younger and Older Adults.
  2. The Revised Almost Perfect Scale
  3. NEGATIVE ATTRIBUTIONAL STYLE AS A MODERATOR OF THE LINK BETWEEN PERFECTIONISM AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE FOR AN INTEGRATIVE MODEL
  4. Perfectionism as a predictor of subsequent adjustment : Evidence for a specific diathesis-stress mechanism among college students
  5. Positive Conceptions of Perfectionism: Approaches, Evidence, Challenges (Personality and Social Psychology Review)
  6. The nature and assessment of perfectionism: A critical analysis.
  7. Self-critical perfectionism and daily affect: dispositional and situational influences on stress and coping. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  8. Perfectionism dimensions, perfectionistic attitudes, dependent attitudes, and depression in psychiatric patients and university students
  9. A programmatic approach to measuring perfectionism: The Almost Perfect Scales.
  10. The relation between perfectionism and distress: Hassles, coping, and perceived social support as mediators and moderators.

Their papers