Designing High-Quality Research in Special Education

By R. Gersten, S. Baker, John Wills Lloyd. 2000

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4715b05c80631dd275266b80126ce1d631f90ded

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Marshall Welch
2. G. Lindsay

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Marshall Welch
2. J. V. Van Luit
3. G. Lindsay
4. Evelyn H. Kroesbergen
5. Radhika Misquitta

Citations in the corpus

• Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming. (2007, background): “Evaluating the effectiveness of inclusive education Examining to what degree, or even whether, an intervention described as inclusive education or mainstreaming may be considered effective is complicated by variations with respect to participants (the range of SEN types, severity, persistence and co”
• Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education: Some Practical Considerations (2008, unknown): “Gersten et al. (2005) and Horner et al.”
• Constructivist mathematics education for students with mild mental retardation (2005, background): “In order to study the effectiveness of guided instruction, a group intervention design appeared to be most powerful ( Gersten et al., 2000 ).”
• Descriptive Analysis of Team Teaching in Two Elementary Classrooms: A Formative Experimental Approach (2000, methodology): “Although these methods are not intended to supplant traditional experimental research methodologies, they provide useful tools for conducting research on newer, less-defined interventions (Gersten et al., 1998).”