Are Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice Conceptually Distinct

By Maureen L. Ambrose, Anke Arnaud. 2005

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43f60cf4c881920eab7b6a3dbd5f569a12952def

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects (2009, background): “With some exceptions (cf., Clayton & Opotow, 2003), however, most contemporary scholars prefer to view interactional justice as separate from procedural (Ambrose & Arnaud, 2005).”
Performance Appraisal Procedural Justice: The Role of a Manager’s Implicit Person Theory (2011, background): “Procedural and interactional justice are arguably conceptually (Ambrose & Arnaud, 2005; Ambrose & Schminke, 2009) and often empirically (e.g., Mayer et al., 2007; Simons & Roberson, 2003) highly related.”
Exploring the linkages between formal ownership and psychological ownership for the organization: The mediating role of organizational justice (2008, unknown): “Employees make distributive justice judgments when receiving ﬁnancial rewards (e.g. salary or bonuses from proﬁt-sharing plans) in exchange for the work they have done, which in-turn inﬂuence their attitudes towards the organization (Ambrose & Arnaud, 2005; Feather, 1999).”
Getting even with one's supervisor and one's organization: relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors (2009, background): “Researchers assert that distributive justice should be included when testing exchange perspectives on justice, especially when comparative inferences are drawn (Ambrose & Arnaud, 2005).”
Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job performance: : integrating self-determination and social exchange theories (2014, background): “Informed by fairness heuristic theory (Lind, 2001; Lind and Tyler, 1988), a small but steady stream of research has started to focus on overall justice which describes a global perception of the fairness of an entity stemming from one’s experiences as well as those of others (Ambrose and Arnaud, 200”
Illuminating the ‘Face’ of Justice: A Meta‐Analytic Examination of Leadership and Organizational Justice (2018, background): “Distributions are [deemed to be] fair to the extent that rewards are proportionally matched to contributions’ (Ambrose and Arnaud, 2005, p. 61).”
Complementary Variable- and Person-Centered Approaches to the Dimensionality of Psychometric Constructs: Application to Psychological Wellbeing at Work (2016, background): “Similarly, the theoretical idea that justice perceptions do follow some kind of holistic process suggests that it might be useful to rely on a model providing a way to explicitly test for the presence of this overarching construct in order to assess its contribution to relevant outcomes over and abo”