Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales
By Mick Couper, Roger Tourangeau, Frederick G. Conrad, E. Singer. 2006
323 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43c24807c75b03523aad403fb733eb9bc5ef5d56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Frederik Funke
- G. MacKerron
- Lisa M. Vallin
- George M. Harrison
- Ulf-Dietrich Reips
- Alex Bryson
- Michael H. Birnbaum
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
In Sociology and Political Science
- Frederik Funke
- Ulf-Dietrich Reips
- G. MacKerron
- Lisa M. Vallin
- George M. Harrison
- Alex Bryson
- Patrick Baylis
- Michael H. Birnbaum
Citations in the corpus
- Are You Happy While You Work (2017, methodology): “Each score is elicited by means of a continuous slider (a form of visual analogue scale — see Couper et al. 2006).”
- Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults (2018, unknown): “The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between the traditional paper-based VAS assessment and VAS scores obtained from each of two different digital VAS platforms (laptop computer and mobile phone) and to determine whether there are (1) statistically significant differences between th”
- Why Semantic Differentials in Web-Based Research Should Be Made from Visual Analogue Scales and Not from 5-Point Scales (2012, result): “This is in line with a large body of literature on VASs yielding the same mean score as ordinal scales (e.g., Averbuch & Katzper, 2004; Flynn et al., 2004; for Web-based research see Couper et al., 2006; Funke & Reips, 2010).”
- Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence (2018, background): “are as reliable as and easier to respond to than visual analogue scales (Couper et al. 2006), few Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical.”
- The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties (2009, unknown): “Our favorable experience with the use of a numeric rating scale compared to continuous VAS scoring reflects the experience of several other groups [21,22,23] and is in line with the recommendations of the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) [24].”
- Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator (2008, unknown): “With the rise of Internet-based research, VASs have become a measurement device that could be used widely without practical drawbacks ( Couper, Tourangeau, Conrad, & Singer, 2006; Funke & Reips, 2006).”
- The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement (2018, unknown): “For example, whether the reliability and validity of VASs outperform those of Likerttype scales remains controversial, especially when different delivering tools are involved (e.g., computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil; Couper et al., 2006; Kuhlmann et al., 2017; Wewers & Lowe, 1990).”