The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement
By Yao-Ting Sung, Jeng-Shin Wu. Behavior Research Methods, 2018
364 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Traditionally, the visual analogue scale (VAS) has been proposed to overcome the limitations of ordinal measures from Likert-type scales. However, the function of VASs to overcome the limitations of response styles to Likert-type scales has not yet been addressed. Previous research using ranking and paired comparisons to compensate for the response styles of Likert-type scales has suffered from limitations, such as that the total score of ipsative measures is a constant that cannot be analyzed by means of many common statistical techniques. In this study we propose a new scale, called the Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking, and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP), which can be used to collect rating, ranking, and paired-comparison data simultaneously, while avoiding the limitations of each of these data collection methods. The characteristics, use, and analytic method of VAS-RRPs, as well as how they overcome the disadvantages of Likert-type scales, ranking, and VASs, are discussed. On the basis of analyses of simulated and empirical data, this study showed that VAS-RRPs improved reliability, response style bias, and parameter recovery. Finally, we have also designed a VAS-RRP Generator for researchers’ construction and administration of their own VAS-RRPs.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/486ff1d917ea8ab27bdb8f99002d4fc0a37cb86a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring Cognitive Load: Are There More Valid Alternatives to Likert Rating Scales? (2021, background): “Sung and Wu (2018) argued that there are several issues inherent to the design of Likert scales, particularly the ambiguous numbers of the response categories and the response style underlying the ordinal measurement of data.”