Affective priming: Findings and theories.

By Karl Christoph Klauer, J. Musch. 2003

467 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43a606672b25d30021a9c827b02d87983601ee02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure (2009, background): “Affective priming effects in this paradigm are reflected in compatibility ef- fects, such that prime-target pairs of matching valence result in faster and more accurate target-evaluations than non-matching pairs (for reviews, see Fazio, 2001; Klauer & Musch, 2003).”
It matters how much you talk: On the automaticity of affective connotations of first and second language words (2011, background): “This effect presumably reflects automatic processing of the prime’s valence – assuming that its processing occurs fast and efficiently with little or no intention or conscious control (see Klauer & Musch, 2003, for a review).”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “…the consensus remains that processes akin to spreading of activation play little or no role in standard affective priming tasks (i.e., tasks in which participants are asked to evaluate the targets; see Klauer & Musch, 2003, for a more detailed review of the evidence supporting this conclusion).”
Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice (2010, unknown): “Priming is believed to occur outside of our awareness, is highly robust, and has been demonstrated in a wide variety of contexts for a wide variety of subjects (for reviews, see Contextual priming that promotes compliant behavior Klauer & Musch, 2003; Neely, 1991; Tulving & Schacter, 1990).”
Attitudes and attitude change. (2002, background): “Most popular among these paradigms are the implicit association test (IAT, Greenwald et al. 1998; for reviews, see Greenwald et al. 2009, Nosek et al. 2007) and the evaluative priming task (for reviews, see De Houwer et al. 2009, Klauer & Musch 2003).”
Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength. (2007, background): “This is not the time to review what is now a very extensive literature (see Fazio, 2001; Klauer & Musch, 2003 for reviews).”
Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. (2011, background): “Experiment 3: Retroactive Priming I In recent years, priming experiments have become a staple of cognitive and cognitive social psychology (Bargh & Ferguson, 2000; Fazio, 2001; Klauer & Musch, 2003).”
Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation (2009, background): “…response is indeed the correct response can be facilitated/inhibited at a post-access level by the evaluative match/mismatch between the primes and the targets (see Klauer & Musch, 2002; Klauer & Musch, 2003; Wentura, 2000, for such post-lexical accounts, and Norris, 1986, for related arguments).”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, methodology): “This task employs the basic idea of sequential priming effects obtained in cognitive psychology (Neely, 1977), using priming effects on evaluative decisions as an indicator of automatic evaluation (for reviews, see Fazio, 2001; Klauer & Musch, 2003).”
Not All Negative Words Slow Down Lexical Decision and Naming Speed: Importance of Word Arousal (2008, background): “Automatic vigilance effects may even produce bias in the cognitive system, resulting in a lower threshold for threat detection in the near future, such as is found with evaluative priming paradigms using negative primes (e.g., De Houwer & Randell, 2004; Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, & Kardes, 1986; He”
No Place for Nostalgia in Science: A Response to Arkes and Tetlock (2004, background): “Evaluative priming effects have been explained in terms of spreading activation (Fazio, 2001) as well as in terms of response competition (Klauer & Musch, 2003).”
Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. (2006, background): “, 300ms) prime of the same hedonic valence (for reviews see Bargh, 1989; Klauer and Musch, 2003).”