When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure

By Roland Deutsch, Bertram Gawronski. 2009

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Researchers often employ implicit measures as dependent variables to investigate processes of attitude formation and change. In such studies, experimentally induced differences are typically interpreted as reflecting change in automatic evaluations. We argue that experimentally induced effects on implicit measures may not always reflect genuine changes in evaluative responses, but can be driven by the mechanisms underlying the measurement procedure. In line with this assumption, the present research shows that these mechanisms can produce opposite effects of the same experimental manipulation for otherwise equivalent implicit measures. These results indicate that merely observing experimental effects on implicit measures does not allow direct inferences regarding changes in automatic evaluations. Instead, psychological interpretations of such effects hinge upon the mechanics of how a given measurement procedure responds to variations in the context. Implications for research using implicit measures are discussed.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d9e26d684e3620d082f08ebf39431bb6ce3c12a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

  1. J. de Houwer
  2. Robert J. Rydell
  3. D. Barnes-Holmes
  4. Bertram Gawronski
  5. Galen Bodenhausen
  6. Nilanjana Dasgupta
  7. Florian Arendt

In Social Psychology

  1. D. Barnes-Holmes
  2. Bertram Gawronski
  3. Sean Hughes
  4. J. de Houwer
  5. Nigel Vahey
  6. Robert J. Rydell
  7. Galen Bodenhausen
  8. Brian A. Nosek

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. D. Barnes-Holmes
  2. J. de Houwer
  3. Sean Hughes
  4. Bertram Gawronski
  5. Nigel Vahey
  6. Robert J. Rydell
  7. Galen Bodenhausen
  8. Brian A. Nosek

Citations in the corpus