Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice

By Jacqueline R. Evans, Christian A. Meissner, S. Brandon, Melissa B. Russano, Steven M. Kleinman. 2010

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/754ff991a7af62804c90076640460bd7a0724c44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. A. Redlich
2. Sujeeta Bhatt
3. Christian A. Meissner
4. Jacqueline R. Evans
5. S. Brandon
6. Aldert Vrij
7. R. Fisher

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Sujeeta Bhatt
2. A. Redlich
3. Christian A. Meissner
4. S. Brandon

In Social Psychology

1. A. Redlich
2. S. Brandon
3. Sujeeta Bhatt
4. Jacqueline R. Evans
5. Stephen W. Michael
6. Christian A. Meissner
7. C. Camilletti
8. Aldert Vrij

Citations in the corpus

• Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review (2014, methodology): “…of military or intelligence interrogations has come under intense scrutiny as a result of the use of “enhanced” interrogation methods in Iraq and Afghanistan and heated debate over the use and efficacy of torture for eliciting information (see Evans et al. 2010; Hartwig et al. 2014; Redlich 2007).”