Missing the Mark: Problems with Marker Variable Choice, Reporting, and Interpretation in the Detection of Common Method Variance
By Marcia J. Simmering, Christie M. Fuller, Yasemin Ocal, Guclu Atinc, Hettie A. Richardson. 2012
489 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4204dca17bdc1d14fe28435fe02a326b2146dd74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- T. Schaller
- Naresh K. Malhotra
- Ashutosh Patil
- Arnd Florack
- Alyssa K. McGonagle
- S. Haasova
- Sonja Kunz
- Tao Zhou
Citations in the corpus
- Fifty shades of food: The influence of package color saturation on health and taste in consumer judgments (2020, background): “Also, modern food science and research in psychology stress the important role of color in food perception (Spence, 2015).”
- Common Method Variance in Advertising Research: When to Be Concerned and How to Control for It (2017, methodology): “Conversely, a distinct but related approach, particularly in terms of analysis, suggests that researchers rely on special-purpose marker variables that represent specific sources of CMV, which the researcher believes are afflicting his or her study (Simmering et al. 2015).”
- Four Research Designs and a Comprehensive Analysis Strategy for Investigating Common Method Variance with Self-Report Measures Using Latent Variables (2016, methodology): “something that is measured, its effective use depends on linking it with a theory of measurement and sources of CMV (Simmering et al. 2015; Spector et al. 2015; Williams et al. 2010).”