Organizational coping with institutional upheaval in transition economies

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Institutions, size and age in transition economies: Implications for export growth (2010, background): “The large firms are expected to continue working according to communist institutional norms and to reflect higher embeddedness with the minimally changed institutional frameworks (Granovetter, 1985; Roth & Kostova, 2003).”
The human resource challenge to outward foreign direct investment aspirations from emerging economies: the case of China (2007, background): “According to Roth and Kostova (2003), in transitional economies, institutional baggage and imperfections proliferate.”
Widening the lens: Rethinking distance, diversity, and foreignness in international business research through positive organizational scholarship (2016, background): “Once again, the paper paves the way for future research on how the specific international context in IB research can highlight important dynamics that serve to expand and/or modify existing management models (Roth & Kostova, 2003).”
An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies (2008, unknown): “…emerging economies, namely, former Eastern bloc countries such as China, Hungary, and Russia going through the transformation from communist to capitalist systems, are so significant and pervasive that they are collectively known as transition economies (Meyer & Peng, 2005; Roth & Kostova, 2003).”