Plagiarism, cultural diversity and metaphor—implications for academic staff development

By B. Leask. 2006

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f171a00d00f37a9fdac0a5ab0be45de5fb882b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize (2007, background): “Implications of the internationalization of higher education for individuals’ teaching practices have been canvassed by Leask (2006), who proposed that academics should deliberately acknowledge the different discourses of plagiarism and strive to work more effectively with intercultural…”
Undergraduate plagiarism: a pedagogical perspective (2008, background): “Furthermore, Leask (2006) remarks that the transition requires time and effort, with much support from staff.”
Exploring academic misconduct: Some insights into student behaviour (2010, unknown): “This confusion, coupled with the apparently rising incidence and the manifold opportunities that internet technology offers for malpractice, makes for a worrying cocktail (Hart and Friesner, 2004; Leask, 2006).”
Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: problematising deficit thinking (2012, background): “Asmar (2005) and Leask (2006) make arguments for the internationalisation of teaching – equipping all students to live and work in a global world with cultural diversity.”
NESB and ESB students' attitudes and perceptions of plagiarism (2006, background): “It is certainly clear that a lack of fluency with the primary language of administration and teaching is a serious handicap that will inhibit participation and achievement, particularly in less structured activities (Volet, 2003) and this is likely to be an issue for NESB students irrespective of th”