Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement

By Shaker A. Zahra, Donald O. Neubaum, Bárbara Larrañeta. 2007

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3de3d0cf9cceaac85e17eeb192c5a077569af1e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Driving factors of innovation in family and non-family SMEs (2018, background): “In general, a variety of indicators are used in research literature to measure family involvement in firms (Astrachan et al. 2002; Zahra et al. 2007; Villalonga and Amit 2006).”
Family Ownership and R&D Intensity in Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Firms (2015, background): “They are often unwilling to innovate and implement changes (Zahra, 2005; Zahra et al., 2007).”
Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance (2014, background): “, 2000), formalized and informal KS (Taminiau et al., 2009; Zahra et al., 2007), exploratory and exploitative KS (Im and Rai, 2008), solicited and voluntary KS (Teng and Song, 2011), and full and partial KS (Ford and Staples, 2010).”
Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment's strategic importance (2012, methodology): “A composite measure was devised to capture the firm’s internal technological capability adapted from the scale developed by Zahra et al. (2007).”
Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research (2018, background): “Accordingly, FFs’ long-term orientation and the involvement of multiple generations are assets fostering innovation capabilities (Craig and Dibrell 2006; Dibrell and Moeller 2011; Lichtenthaler and Muethel 2012; Llach and Nordquist 2010; Zahra et al. 2004, 2007).”
Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture (2010, background): “Knowledge in family businesses is defined as explicit and tacit knowledge which family members have gained and developed through education and experience within and outside the organization (Zahra et al., 2007; Chirico, 2008).”
The Effects of Family Firm Specific Sources of Tmt Diversity: The Moderating Role of Information Exchange Frequency (2010, positive): “In short, we assume that the diversity introduced by the firm’s controlling family will be reflected in the TMT, directly or indirectly, regardless of team composition (see also Ensley and Pearson, 2005; Zahra et al., 2007).”
Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion (2012, background): “It generates new knowledge for building new skills and capabilities that could lead to competitive advantage (Chirico 2008; Zahra et al. 2007a ).”
Family Business Growth Around the World (2020, neutral): “Others use family management (Sciascia et al., 2013; Zahra et al., 2007).”