Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance
By Jeremy C. Short, Dave J. Ketchen, Jr, T. Palmer, G. Tomas, M. Hult. 2007
399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d568b92a80fc53840bbd4e779a727639b266428
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- A. McKelvie
- Marko Sarstedt
- Jeremy C. Short
- Gaylen N. Chandler
- Dave J. Ketchen
- Sascha Raithel
- Sebastian Scharf
- Manfred Schwaiger
In Strategy and Management
- Marko Sarstedt
- Jeremy C. Short
- J. Wieseke
- Sascha Raithel
- Manfred Schwaiger
- Sebastian Scharf
- Christian Homburg
- Gaylen N. Chandler
Citations in the corpus
- Marketing Performance Measurement Systems: Does Comprehensiveness Really Improve Performance? (2012, methodology): “…different product market characteristics lead to very different, industry-specific profit margins, we believed that comparing absolute ROS over different industries could bias our analyses (Short et al. 2007).8 We validated the ROS performance measure reported by marketing managers in several ways.”
- On the value relevance of customer satisfaction. Multiple drivers and multiple markets (2012, background): “ship is significantly associated with financial performance ( Short et al. 2007 ).”
- The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: Evidence from Malaysia (2013, background): “Different firm uses different strategies of performance (Collins and Porras, 2000); hence, a firm’s performance is concentrated in its strategy (Short et al., 2007).”
- Construct Validation Using Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA) (2010, background): “Differences in firm performance have often been found based on industry (e.g., Rumelt, 1991; McGahan & Porter, 1997) and strategic group membership (e.g., Short, Ketchen, Palmer, & Hult, 2007).”
- Firm and industry effects on firm performance: A generalization and extension for new ventures (2009, methodology): “Conclusions concerning our competing hypotheses were based on comparing the amount of variance explained at each level of analysis for new ventures versus established fi rms; this was the approach used in Short et al. (2007) for comparing HLM-based effects.”
- SME Innovative Capacity, Competitive Advantage and Performance in a 'Traditional' Industrial Region of Portugal (2009, neutral): “…various studies on this theme, a research model was developed with the following five dimensions: (1) the firm (Ferreira, 2003; Acquaah, 2007; Short et al., 2007); (2) the entrepreneur (Ferreira, 2003); (3) the firm’s external business environment (Hitt, et al. , 2001; Elbanna and Child,…”
- Categories and Competition (2017, background): “…appears in strategic management journals, as scholars continue to flesh out the implications of “middle-level” categories straddling firm level distinctiveness and market-based competitive forces (e.g., Más-Ruiz et al., 2005; Lee, Lee and Rho, 2002; Short et al., 2007; DeSarbo and Grewal, 2008).”