Cyberbullying and Cyber Aggression

By Pete Smith. 2012

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d3c373a89df35a66bdc50bba79ebc87c6d4ad8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: typology of the phenomenon (2012, background): “Young people in all developed and developing countries are among the most frequent users of new media (Calmaestra et al. 2010; Domitrek and Raby 2008; Smith 2012; Tokunaga 2010; Ybarra, Mitchell, and Lenhart 2010) and some of them will engage in”
Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice (2013, background): “…complaints (headaches, abdominal pains), sleeping difficulties, physical symptomatology, with effects strongest for bully-victims, especially males (Agatston et al., 2012; Marczak & Coyne, 2010; Menesini & Nocentini, 2012; Smith, 2012b; Sourander et al., 2010; von Marées & Petermann, 2012).”
Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying (2012, result): “This finding is consistent with many previous studies (e.g. Tokunaga 2010; Smith 2012).”
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “Some reviews of cyberbullying already exist (e.g., Mora-Merchán & Jäger, 2010; Smith, 2012; Smith & Slonje, 2010; Tokunaga, 2010), but the area is developing very rapidly, in part as new technologies develop and new fashions (such as particular social network sites) appear.”
What Makes a Bully a Cyberbully? Unravelling the Characteristics of Cyberbullies across Twenty-Five European Countries (2013, background): “This study confirms within one cross-national sample some of the key findings previously found in several separate studies (e.g. Erdur-Baker, 2010; Smith, 2011, 2012; Vandebosch & van Cleemput, 2008).”
Prevalence and Association of Sexting and Online Sexual Victimization Among Spanish Adults (2015, background): “At the same time, as with other forms of online aggression, the perpetrator does not see the victim’s reaction immediately through the Internet (Smith 2012), which may enhance the lack of sensitivity and empathy for the victim and increase the probability of victimization.”
Cyberbullying Definition Among Adolescents: A Comparison Across Six European Countries (2012, unknown): “This is arguably not so important in the virtual context, because the nature of Information and Communication Technology can lead to an immense number of victimizations without the contribution of the perpetrator.(2,4,15) The strongest criterion needed to define cyberbullying is imbalance of power, ”
Longitudinal Risk Factors for Cyberbullying in Adolescence (2013, background): “Furthermore, preventive efforts need to involve and to actively support both the school and the parents in their efforts to deliver the prevention program (Smith, 2011 b).”
Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? (2012, background): “However, there is a severe lack of evidence regarding the success of these suggested coping strategies (Perren et al. 2012; Smith 2012).”
Cyberbullying among University Students: Gendered Experiences, Impacts, and Perspectives (2014, background): “The anonymity of the Internet therefore fits well with the girls’ preferred “style” of bullying [19, 22, 34, 35].”
Cyberbullying: Challenges and opportunities for a research program—A response to Olweus (2012) (2012, background): “I largely agree with three substantive points made by Olweus (2012, this issue), and, indeed, these points have been made in other reviews (Smith, 2012; Tokunaga, 2010).”