The Eye as a Theoretician: Seeing Structures in Generalizing Activities.
By Luis Radford. 2010
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d23dadcfb7c4d53fd0d6e222c436841d40ac27a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Luis Radford
- Ricardo Nemirovsky
- Chris Rasmussen
- Megan Wawro
- F. Arzarello
- C. Andrà
- C. Sabena
- Paulina Lindström
Citations in the corpus
- When the Classroom Floor Becomes the Complex Plane: Addition and Multiplication as Ways of Bodily Navigation (2012, background): “In recent years, there has been a growing interest in this relationship between embodied cognition and mathematics learning and abstraction (Alibali & GoldinMeadow, 1993; Alibali & Nathan, 2007; Goodwin, 2000; Radford, 2009, 2010; Roth, Bowen, & Masciotra, 2002; Roth & Welzel, 2001; Tall, 2004).”
- READING MATHEMATICS REPRESENTATIONS: AN EYE-TRACKING STUDY (2015, background): “As Radford stressed in several works (see e.g. Radford, 2002; 2010), a crucial problem for learners is to designate in different ways the objects of discourse, in the two semiotic registers (this has also been pointed out by Duval, 2006).”
- Early Algebraic Thinking: Epistemological, Semiotic, and Developmental Issues (2012, background): “Such a linkage rests on the cultural transformation in the manner in which sequences can be seen—a transformation that may be termed the domestication of the eye (Radford, 2010).”