THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE

By L. R. Goldberg. 1992

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Item Response Modeling of Forced-Choice Questionnaires (2011, methodology): “First, participants rated the three items using a 5-point rating scale suggested by Goldberg (1992), ranging from ‘‘very accurate’’ to ‘‘very inaccurate.’’”
Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. (2002, background): “…significantly with Openness to Experience; Costa & McCrae, 1992, p. 47), and adaptation-innovation (adaptive [Digman, 1989, p. 203] and innovative [Goldberg, 1992, p. 35] are trait markers of Openness to Experience).2 In terms of job satisfaction, consistent with the recommendations of…”
Mentoring provided: Relation to mentor’s career success, personality, and mentoring received (2004, unknown): “…(Byravan & Ramanaiah, 1995; Conn & Rieke, 1994; Russell & Karol, 1994) demonstrates the correspondence between the global factors of the 16PF5 and other personality inventories that aim at tapping the FFM, including the NEO PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992) and Goldberg s Marker Scales (Goldberg, 1992).”
Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. (2007, background): “A pool of 300 trait names was selected to be representative for all dimensions described in the introduction (see also Anderson, 1968; Goldberg, 1992).”
Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person x situation perspective. (2007, unknown): “Specifically, the natural language trait words associated with Agreeableness include sympathetic, generous, forgiving, and helpful (Goldberg, 1992; Graziano, Jensen-Campbell, Steele, & Hair, 1998; Graziano & Tobin, 2002; Kohnstamm, Halverson, Mervielde, & Havill, 1998).”
Personality and sexual risk taking: a quantitative review. (2000, background): “An alternative perspective involves a primary focus on situational forces on behavior and asks whether personality modifies the effect of such forces (Goldberg, 1992b).”
Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent (2010, background): “Evolutionary psychologists contend that the human brain consists of domain-specific evolved psychological mechanisms, which evolved to solve specific adaptive problems (problems of survival and reproduction) in specific domains.”
Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior (2006, methodology): “Thirty-eight traits were selected from Goldberg’s trait markers for the Big-Five personality dimensions (e.g., Goldberg, 1992), three of which were agentic leadership traits.”
Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire (2005, methodology): “Participants were given a questionnaire booklet containing the CAQ, the NEO-FFI Openness to Experience Scale (Costa & McCrae, 1992), the 30-item CPS (Gough, 1979), and the Big Five Intellect Adjectives (Goldberg, 1992).”
Other-rated personality and academic performance: Evidence and implications (2014, methodology): “In addition, a number ofmethod variables were tested as potential moderators in order confirm whether observed results were due to an artifact: whether FFM ratings were based on a single rater's responses or were the average of responses from multiple raters; the time lag between personality and aca”