Leadership styles: some evidence from the Turkish construction industry

By Heyecan Giritli, G. T. Oraz. 2004

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cbe909a4f786b979e397e946b969bef56f79e8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Dirk Lindebaum
2. S. Fielden
3. J. Reeve

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Dirk Lindebaum
2. S. Fielden
3. J. Reeve
4. Patricia Hardré
5. Gerben A. van Kleef

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Dirk Lindebaum
2. S. Fielden
3. J. Reeve
4. Richard M. Ryan
5. Gerben A. van Kleef
6. Edward L. Deci
7. Anja H. Olafsen
8. C. Rigby

Citations in the corpus

• Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy‐supportive motivating style toward employees: an intervention study (2009, background): “Theorists have proposed various models of the internal and external factors that shape and influence management style (e.g. Chitayat & Venezia, 1984; Giritli & Oraz, 2004).”
• ‘It’s good to be angry’: Enacting anger in construction project management to achieve perceived leader effectiveness (2011, background): “…CPM in construction, especially against the backdrop that construction is consistently characterized by aggressive/authoritative management styles (Giritli and Oraz, 2003; Smithers and Walker, 2000), adversarial relationships (Holt et al., 2000), tight profit margins (Agapiou et al., 1998),…”