Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model (2007, methodology): “Referring to a different intergroup setting, Wenzel et al. (2003, Study 2) asked German participants for judgements about Germans (ingroup), Poles (outgroup), and Europeans (superordinate category).”
Inclusion in a superordinate category, in-group prototypicality, and attitudes towards out-groups (2004, methodology): “Measure 1 was an open attribute measure that has been used in previous research (Waldzus et al., 2003).”
When 'different' means 'worse': in-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts (2005, background): “Waldzus et al. / Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 76–83 77”
Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences (2008, background): “As mentioned in the introduction, some research suggests that the characteristic people perceive to share with group members might also be the fact that they are different (See Rink, 2005; Van Knippenberg & Haslam, 2003; Waldzus et al., 2003).”