When procedural fairness does not influence how good I feel: The effects of voice and leader selection as a function of belongingness needs
By David de Cremer, H. Alberts. 2004
52 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3aa75c63b0b354957db93c4f4b957649bd1326df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
- M. Hogg
- Barbara van Knippenberg
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Tom Tyler
- J. Reb
- Barry M. Goldman
Citations in the corpus
- Leadership and fairness: The state of the art (2006, background): “Other research by De Cremer and colleagues suggests that leader procedural fairness may also reflect positively on follower self-esteem and positive affect (De Cremer & Alberts, 2004 ; De Cremer, van Knippenberg, van Knippenberg, Mullenders, & Stinglhamber, 2005 ).”
- Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change ☆ (2005, background): “Recently, it has been argued that procedural justice can also be seen an act of social influence (Tyler, 2001) and therefore could be considered an important component of leadership (Chemers, 2001; De Cremer & Alberts, 2004).”
- Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda (2004, background): “Although leader (procedural) fairness is not typically studied in relation to leadership, there is increasing recognition that leader fairness is an integral part of leadership (e.g., De Cremer & Alberts, 2004; De Cremer & Tyler, in press; De Cremer & van Knippenberg, 2003).”
- Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice (2005, background): “…Sedikides & Green, 2001; Trope, Ferguson, & Raghunathan, 2001) and partly due to the renewed relevance of the experience of positive affect when self-related needs are met (Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Buckley, Winkel, & Leary, 2004; De Cremer & Alberts, 2004; Sedikides, Wildschut, & Baden, 2004).”
- Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. (2006, methodology): “Based on the work of De Cremer and his colleagues (e.g., De Cremer, 2002; De Cremer & Alberts, 2004; De Cremer & Leonardelli, 2003, De Cremer & Tyler, 2005) we argue that individuals also seek to maintain a sense of belonging to important groups.”
- Am I Respected or Not?: Inclusion and Reputation as Issues in Group Membership (2005, background): “Moreover, across a series of studies, this scale has shown to be reliable and predictive of people’s reactions toward social and relational information (see also De Cremer and Leonardelli, 2003; De Cremer and Alberts, 2004).”