How well can the theory of planned behavior account for occupational intentions

By J. Arnold, John Loan-Clarke, Crispin R. Coombs, Adrian Wilkinson, Jennifer R Park, D. Preston. 2006

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We tested the capacity of an extended version of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to account for intentions to work for the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) as a nurse, physiotherapist or radiographer amongst three groups: professionally unqualified (N = 507), in professional training (N = 244), and professionally qualified (N = 227). We found strong support for the three core TPB variables attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control as predictors of behavioral intention, and limited support for two additional variables: moral obligation and identification. There were some differences in the relative importance of TPB variables between groups. We conclude that the TPB has utility for more complex behaviors as well as simpler ones that are more frequently researched. However, more attention should be paid to differences in people’s circumstances, particularly regarding past vocational decisions and behavior, and to obstacles to implementing an intention.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a6c5b4ad466b518f47cfec4abced14c8525edbd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. L. Cohen
  2. M. D. Jong
  3. Cathy H. C. Hsu
  4. J. Arnold
  5. E. V. Hooft
  6. Songshan (Sam) Huang
  7. Heesup Han
  8. Choong‐Ki Lee

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. E. V. Hooft

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Songshan (Sam) Huang
  2. Cathy H. C. Hsu
  3. L. Cohen
  4. M. D. Jong
  5. J. Arnold
  6. E. V. Hooft
  7. Heesup Han
  8. Choong‐Ki Lee

Citations in the corpus