Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making : When and why does it work?

By W. V. Ginkel, D. van Knippenberg. 2009

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a608a838283bb4f6aa9cae07bd2e692906b8f18

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Wendy P. van Ginkel
2. D. van Knippenberg
3. I. Hoever
4. H. Barkema

In Social Psychology

1. Wendy P. van Ginkel
2. I. Hoever
3. D. van Knippenberg
4. H. Barkema
5. M. Hogg
6. David de Cremer
7. Eugene Yu Jin Tee
8. S. A. Haslam

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Wendy P. van Ginkel
2. H. Barkema
3. I. Hoever
4. D. van Knippenberg
5. M. Hogg
6. David de Cremer
7. Astrid C. Homan
8. S. A. Haslam

Citations in the corpus

• A Diversity Mindset Perspective on Inclusive Leadership (2021, methodology): “Drawing on research by van Ginkel and van Knippenberg (2008, 2009, 2012) showing that team members often are insufficiently aware of the importance of information elaboration, van Knippenberg et al. argued that a focus on information elaboration in diverse teams is not a given.”
• Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential. (2010, background): “Likewise, there has been consistent support for elaboration as a mediator of the benefits of diversity across laboratory (Homan et al., 2007; van Ginkel & van Knippenberg, 2008, 2009) and field studies (Kearney & Gebert, 2009; Kearney et al., 2009) and various operationalizations of diversity.”