Who emerges as a leader? Meta-analyses of individual differences as predictors of leadership emergence

By N. Ensari, R. Riggio, Julie Christian, Gregory Carslaw. 2011

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39dee2c6c1d1e2c175904b9bf628274c9439fbed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Trent Engbers
2. Taha Hameduddin
3. Douglas J. Brown
4. W. Shen

In Gender Studies

1. Trent Engbers
2. Taha Hameduddin
3. Douglas J. Brown

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Trent Engbers
2. N. Kwok
3. Taha Hameduddin
4. Douglas J. Brown
5. W. Shen

Citations in the corpus

• Leadership and public service motivation: a systematic synthesis (2021, background): “…especially when considered alongside other traits and individual differences shown to predict leadership emergence (or its implicit attribution), such as conscientiousness, extraversion, self-efficacy, motivation to lead, and gender (Ensari et al. 2011; Badura et al. 2018; Badura et al. 2020).”
• Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships (2015, unknown): “High levels of extraversion are important because extraversion is a leading indicator of leadership emergence (Ensari et al., 2011; Judge et al., 2002).”
• How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: A social network analysis (2018, methodology): “Based on prior leadership research (e.g., Ensari et al., 2011; Lanaj & Hollenbeck, 2015; Lord & Dinh, 2014), three common operationalizations of leader emergence were used in the current study: ratings of leadership potential, promotability, and influence.”